Valentin Villenave <[email protected]> writes: > On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 9:45 AM, David Kastrup <[email protected]> wrote: >> Lilypond would see if that were the case. > > What, are you implying that LilyPond should decide that > ... > This seems haphazard to me. Perhaps I misunderstood your comment?
I don't know what exactly tieWaitForNote is supposed to do, but if it is not set, > a~ b should not be silently ignored, but issue a warning or error. -- Johan _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
