Valentin Villenave <[email protected]> writes: > On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 12:38 PM, David Kastrup <[email protected]> wrote: >> Means a tie, as indicated by the user. > > Oh. So, setting tieWaitForNote would disable the "automatic-slurs" > feature?
They would be mutually exclusive, and both off by default, resulting in a warning instead. >> Means bad input. Configurable to be treated as a slur to b. > > Then it would no longer be "bad input", would it? Correct. > My main concern is that such a change would amount to make the input > syntax more "fault-tolerant", which isn't the direction we've been > taking so far. As long as it is not the default. > That being said, unterminated ties are currently allowed and do not > produce any warning, so I don't think the current situation is optimal > either. If anything, we could at least output a "warning: unfinished > tie. A slur will be printed instead". > How does it seems to you? I'd rather just warn, unless a specific option is set. I don't think it makes much sense to both warn and typeset a slur. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
