On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Jan Warchoł <
lemniskata.bernoulli...@gmail.com> wrote:

> 2010/11/25 Steve Yegge <steve.ye...@gmail.com>
>
>> I bit the bullet and went through all 100-odd guitar music publications
>> I've
>> collected over the years, from publishers around the world on every
>> continent,
>> across multiple genres (although admittedly mostly classical and South
>> American).  The set includes many volumes whose purpose is purely
>> didactic.   And yet I was only able to find three books that use this
>> notation.
>>
>> So I suspect that "standard" isn't exactly the right word to use here. :-)
>> It's probably better to say that it's the "correct" way of guitar notation
>> -- one
>> that is satisfying from a theoretician's standpoint, but rarely used in
>> practice.
>>
>
> I have two guitar publications using this notation (treble clef with
> explicit 8 at the bottom).
>
> Frankly, the absence of this mark in many of the scores annoys me very
> much. Nobody gets hurt by this tiny 8, and its presence clarifies things. In
> my opinion we should support it, there's no point in sticking to a wrong
> habit :)
>
> cheers,
> Janek
>

OK, you've all convinced me.  I would be ashamed to publish a
professional-quality LilyPond-typeset score without the tiny 8 now.  I will
be sure to include it. :)

-steve
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to