On 14/02/2011, Francisco Vila <paconet....@gmail.com> wrote: > 2011/2/14 Father Gordon Gilbert <fatherg...@gmail.com>: >> Thank you -- so I did which for both, and with the .py nothing comes >> up, and without, it shows /usr/local/bin. So how do I get these >> things working? On this machine, I'll have quite a bit of upgrading, >> from 2.5.x I believe. Compiling works now, but convert-ly-ing doesn't >> yet, even though I've got /usr/local/bin in the main path now. > > I'm glad to see it already works for you. To tell you the truth, > convert-ly doesn'n work for me in lilypondTool. The whole concept of > the configuration is windows-oriented, that is: set a folder name for > the binaries, then set executable names for commands in that folder. > In Linux we name commands and they work because they are in the path > if they are properly installed. > > I'd like to summarize the whole set of configs for lilypondtool > commands, for Linux. Forwarding to Bertalan (its author) > > > -- > Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) > www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com >
Thanks Francisco. I'm gratified that it now works. I originally began using Lilypond on a FreeBSD machine in about 2002 (on version 2.2.2, iirc) and did a great deal of work on hymns and the like around 2004-5 with version 2.5.x. But in various upgrades, my BSD machine began not to support the various dependencies (or whatever) and I found it easier to use my Windoze machine. But in the presence of my son the computer genius this past weekend, we first got java working, then jEdit/LilypondTool, then Lilypond. With that combination going, I may now try working on Frescobaldi and see how that is. Thanks to all for your help. I love this program! Blessings, Gordon+ -- Fr. Gordon Gilbert Penetanguishene, ON _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
