David Kastrup <[email protected]> wrote: > Maybe the reply-to header of the digest should not even point to the > list? Replying to a digest makes no sense with regard to message > threading anyway.
I have strong opinions about this, in part because I participate in another mailing list that uses the "no-reply" trick for the digest. In my opinion, you are proposing a government approach here: you are proposing legislative action to solve a problem that only occurs rarely, and when it does occur is easily solved through education. I don't think you need to make it harder for those of us who have learned the lesson, just because someone does something inappropriate once every few months. -- Tim Roberts, [email protected] Providenza & Boekelheide, Inc.
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
