Tim Roberts <t...@probo.com> writes: > David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: >> Maybe the reply-to header of the digest should not even point to the >> list? Replying to a digest makes no sense with regard to message >> threading anyway. > > I have strong opinions about this, in part because I participate in > another mailing list that uses the "no-reply" trick for the digest. > > In my opinion, you are proposing a government approach here: you are > proposing legislative action to solve a problem that only occurs rarely, > and when it does occur is easily solved through education. I don't > think you need to make it harder for those of us who have learned the > lesson, just because someone does something inappropriate once every few > months.
How does it make it harder? As I said, replying to a digest makes no sense with regard to message threading anyway. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
