Thanks Phil,
I'd not realised it was already in the issue list.
As I'm only a casual user (a performer, not usually an arranger or composer)
I'm never sure whether to raise an issue or mention a problem on the mailing
list.
Best regards,
Peter
mailto:lilyp...@ptoye.com
www.ptoye.com
-------------------------
Saturday, April 5, 2014, 11:59:53 AM, you wrote:
Whole note tremolos are not pretty. See
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1444
--
Phil Holmes
----- Original Message -----
From: Peter Toye
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2014 11:55 AM
Subject: Problems with tremolo signs
I'm having problems with a tremolo sign (see snippet):
1) It's too short - surely there should be a minimum size for it and it should
be shunted to the next line?
2) It's in rather an odd place vertically: surely it should be either between
the notes if they're well-separated as here or below both of them?
3) In printed music, tremolo signs between notes (not when attached to stems)
are usually slanted, which stops them getting mixed up with the staff lines.
I agree that there are probably tweaks for these, but I'd hope that the
defaults wouldn't need tweaking.
Regards,
Peter
mailto:lilyp...@ptoye.com
www.ptoye.com
\version "2.18.0"
\language "english"
left = \relative c' {
c1 c c c c c c c c c c c c
\repeat tremolo 16 { c 32 c,} |
}
\score {
\new PianoStaff
\new Staff { \clef bass \left }
}
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
