On 10/17/2012 02:55 PM, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
Andy Doan <[email protected]> writes:
On 10/16/2012 07:47 PM, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
We're going to be talking about test case management in LAVA at the
Connect. I've brain-dumped some of my thoughts here:
https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/LAVA/Specs/TestCaseManagement
Comments welcome. But if all you do is read it before coming to the
session, that's enough for me :-)
It feels good just to see this all listed concisely.
I think we probably need one other section in the page like "testdef
organization". This would describe any rules we have file filenames or
directory hierarchies needed by the git/bzr testdef repo so that we'll
know how to import things.
Yeah. I guess there is also an issue around namespacing if we allow
pulling from multiple branches -- if you pull from two places and both
define the test called "stream", what happens?
good point.
Another thought -- do we want to have private tests?
I think we have to assume yes considering these test defs will/should
contain descriptions of tests. However, a private repo doesn't feel like
much of a difference other than the URL given to us to pull from. I'd
think you'd just want to use a white-listing approach like we currently
do for private builds.
_______________________________________________
linaro-validation mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation
