Zygmunt Krynicki <[email protected]> writes: > W dniu 17.10.2012 19:11, Andy Doan pisze: >> On 10/16/2012 07:47 PM, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: >>> We're going to be talking about test case management in LAVA at the >>> Connect. I've brain-dumped some of my thoughts here: >>> >>> https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/LAVA/Specs/TestCaseManagement >>> >>> Comments welcome. But if all you do is read it before coming to the >>> session, that's enough for me :-) >> >> It feels good just to see this all listed concisely. >> >> I think we probably need one other section in the page like "testdef >> organization". This would describe any rules we have file filenames or >> directory hierarchies needed by the git/bzr testdef repo so that we'll >> know how to import things. > > Incidentally that's something we may collaborate on.
Yeah, so how does checkbox deal with this? I guess it doesn't quite have the concept of remote users submitted requests that jobs are run? (i.e. checkbox is more dispatcher than scheduler in lava terminology). I wonder if checkbox's rfc822ish format would be better than JSON for test interchange... > How can I participate in that meeting? I imagine the google+ arrangments will be similar. Cheers, mwh _______________________________________________ linaro-validation mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation
