Paul D Thomas wrote: > > Seems better than 72dpi if you start with a 300dpi raster. That was seven hundred twenty dots per inch. :) As I noted, the image was better than what I see in magazines in newspapers. -- Howard Gibson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: PhotoCD, multitrack, books and linart.. hgibson
- Re: PhotoCD, multitrack, books and linart.. Michael Stutz
- Re: PhotoCD, multitrack, books and linart.. Howard Gibson
- Re: PhotoCD, multitrack, books and linart.. Paul D Thomas
- Re: PhotoCD, multitrack, books and linart.. Pixel Fairy
- Re: PhotoCD, multitrack, books and linart.. Evelyn Mitchell
- Re: PhotoCD, multitrack, books and linart.. Michael Stutz
- Re: PhotoCD, multitrack, books and linart.. Pixel Fairy
- Re: PhotoCD, multitrack, books and linart.. hgibson
- Re: PhotoCD, multitrack, books and linart.. Paul D Thomas
- Re: PhotoCD, multitrack, books and linart.. Howard Gibson
- Re: PhotoCD, multitrack, books and linart.. Lance Levsen
- Re: PhotoCD, multitrack, books and linart.. Howard Gibson
