Hello Krystal, neighbors, friends and Lincoln Talkers all,
I hope you will take a minute to read my observations re COA and Parks and Recreation surveys and Krystals comments re the Lincoln Station site. …hope you find it of interest. As to the committee’s survey, it did not effectively ask Lincoln residents to step back, consider, and provide insightful textual feedback on the wide range of location options Town Meeting asked the committee to examine. The survey did not, for example, look to find the points of geographic intersection between the daily lives and rhythms of Lincoln residents and the location of services they want and need. The committee was asked to engage with Lincoln residents through their survey re the extremely consequential Housing Choice Act on the prospective location for COA services …but did not. Although the committee expressed a desire to be “aspirational” at a public meeting in early April, their survey was not designed to gain an understanding of the shared values of Lincoln residents. These are necessary to understand if residents’ aspirations are to be met. There is also a claim below that Lincoln residents will be well served to reexamine: ‘There is no viable site at Lincoln Station for a Council on Aging & Human Services (COA&HS) center. It is widely known throughout Lincoln that the occupancy rate at Lincoln Station is rather low. It’s logical to assume that the mall’s owner will be able to create space for the COA within the necessary time frame. It will be to the owner’s great advantage to do so. And there is a suggestion that the committee has had no conversation with the land owner: “No private land owner has talked to the Town about siting a center on their property.” This begs the questions…isn’t it the responsibility of the committee to reach out to the land owner?…isn’t this the charge Town Meeting gave to the committee? Lastly, some at Town Meeting made it evident that restraining costs are important. It is widely understood that “build-out” expenses in existing structures are far less than new construction and/or full on renovations as envisioned at Hartwell. This financial comparative exercise, too, is included in the committee’s charge at Town Meeting and should be done for this option. Best, Joe Joe Robbat Old Concord Road From: Lincoln <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Krystal Wood Sent: Wednesday, May 3, 2023 9:37 PM To: Lincoln Talk <[email protected]> Subject: [LincolnTalk] Survey Responses Regarding the Community Center Location Survey Responses regarding the Community Center Location. While the motion approved at the November 2022 Special Town Meeting recognized that the Community Center would be located at the Hartwell Complex, in the recent CCBC survey responses and during the open microphone Community Center meeting on April 4, some residents expressed their continuing interest in locating the Center at Lincoln Station, or in the consideration of other locations around town. There are a number of issues that are worth more explanation. The Lincoln Station location: 1. The Parks and Recreation (PRD) programs are located at existing space at the Hartwell complex, and will continue to be located at Hartwell, so Lincoln children can easily walk to their after-school activities. 2. There is no viable site at Lincoln Station for a Council on Aging & Human Services (COA&HS) center. No private land owner has talked to the Town about siting a center on their property. The Town owns three properties: the DPW site, paved commuter parking lot and unpaved commuter parking lot. Consultants in a previous study estimated the cost for moving the DPW to the only viable site (Transfer Station) to be about $25 million. The unpaved commuter lot is too small. The paved commuter lot provides public parking for the commuter rail, and presents challenges complying with MBTA requirements for appropriate parking capacity at train stations. Limited parking correlates with reduced train service. The MBTA and its constituency can be expected to protest a reduction in public parking at any MBTA station. Building on the paved lot would also eliminate the possibility of using the lot for potential commercial activity or a potential housing development. (Additional housing is the top priority for the revitalization efforts.) 3. Any construction for a center at Lincoln Station will require public funding for site preparation, parking, and a building, in addition to public funding for solving PRD’s facility and office space needs in Hartwell Complex. 4. Locating the COA&HS center at Lincoln Station would require duplication of facilities with those used by PRD in the Hartwell Complex, adding significantly to the construction costs, and also the maintenance and management costs. 5. Trying to use other locations at Lincoln Station -- above the bank, above Donelan’s, other Rural Land Foundation property etc., if available, would also reduce the options for future housing. There are many important considerations for locating the Community Center at Hartwell: 1. The PRD and COA&HS can co-locate as they need similar types of facilities and, most importantly, can share the same spaces. Both provide fitness activities, but largely at different times of the day. PRD and COA&HS provide arts-and-craft activities that can again be located in the same space, at different days and times etc. Use of the same facilities will provide significant reduction in construction costs, and provide operational efficiency gains. 2. There are synergies between the School, PRD and COA&HS programs, and the Hartwell location that will provide readily accessible opportunities for intergenerational activities unhindered by distance and transportation logistics of separate locations. 3. The campus has been studied extensively to ensure that a community center could be located on Ballfield Road, and it was determined that with proper design, there is sufficient space for parking and circulation. 4. The campus location is aesthetically more pleasing than the commuter lot at Lincoln Station. PRD and COA&HS programming beyond the Hartwell Complex Currently, PRD and COA&HS programs occur at many locations around town, other than the Hartwell Complex and both organizations will continue to use these locations. For a full listing please see the Decentralized Programming Matrix on the CCBC web site. 1. Currently the PRD runs programs at the Lincoln School Reed and Smith gyms, the School Auditorium and Learning Commons, and at Bemis Hall, Pierce House, the Library, First Parish Church, and Codman Farm, amongst other locations; and at town athletic facilities including Codman Pool, the sport and tennis courts, playgrounds, athletic fields and parks. 2. The COA&HS has programs at the First Parish Church, at Lincoln Woods, Hartwell Complex, the Pierce House tent, The Commons In Lincoln, the Ryan Estates, Minuteman Technical High School, on Lincoln’s trail network. There is a recognized need to revitalize Lincoln Station, but at the 2022 November Special Town Meeting, the democratic process resulted in a clear consensus and support for the amended motion for developing options for design choices and budgets for the Community Center Building at the Hartwell Complex. Thank you for taking the time to read through these clarifications, and for engaging in the process to discern how we address Lincoln’s challenges together.
-- The LincolnTalk mailing list. To post, send mail to [email protected]. Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/. Change your subscription settings at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
