>>The fact of the matter is that actionscript and lingo are very similar in >>syntax, actionscript being slightly more "proper", in terms of traditonal >>programming languages, and I find it quite simple to move back and forth. > > >That's a bit misleading. It's true that using dot syntax in Director >can have similarities to ActionScript using dot syntax, but one of >the attractions of Director is how near-English the language can be, >which for many people who haven't used more formal languages is a >nice feature. >
But to move from Lingo to actionscript is quite simple; it is a shame how people on both direct-l and flashcoders get so bent out of shape when the other software make leaps forward. Why not just learn both instead of beind tunnel visioned individuals. Brian Douglas (:ub) ============================================================================ [To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
