> Since your list of images is finite (i.e. there can be only one image of each distinct type, such as #FFFFFF)
That is not the case. There can be numerous pictures with the same code. Why not? There could be more than one picture of a green animal (if those were coded criteria) >>Fetch me a banana, but only if you haven't got a tomato yet. Every >>evaluation stands for itself. >This sounds like what I think you've been asking to do, and would be a reason why a single pass test might not work. So, which is it, are you happy with some that can find the bananas, or do you want the user to be able to do the second illustration above? I don't need the second idea "if you haven't got a tomato yet", because when you made your decision about selecting an item you would have to know what other items there were. This is not relevant. BUT the banana thing is still too simple. What I was missing was the ability to make alternative decisions within the criteria coded in one filename. Like: "Fetch me a yellow picture of a fruit or a picture of a non-food thing that can be either brown or green" or in other words: "Fetch me a picture that is mostly yellow if it is also a fruit or that is mostly brown or green if it is not a fruit." It was the adaption of this kind of "OR" and the possibilities of even more "OR" of this kind, that my original questions was about. See? [To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
