It's the only major difference besides the upgraded Flash integration. The other significant differences are the speech xtra, and UI changes, as well as adding editing integration with the other MX apps.
Charlie Fiskeaux II Media Designer The Creative Group www.cre8tivegroup.com 859/858-9054x29 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Fletcher Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 4:48 PM Subject: Re: <lingo-l> OK to go from 8.0 to MX? > I began writing an app in Mx and was forced to move it to 8.5. To my > surprise, 8.5 was able to open the MX file, and everything worked just as it > had in MX. I wonder if maybe native OSX support is the only difference? > > f > > on 3/11/03 3:16 PM, Cole Tierney at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >> I'm getting ready to "go prime time" with a Director app written in > >> 8.0 - does anyone see a reason why I shouldn't create the projector > >> using MX? Would your answer hold true for both Mac and PC? > > > > Depends on your audience. The biggest benefit for the mac side is > > native support for MacOSX, which is becoming increasingly important. > > [To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!] > [To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
