zac wrote:
>
> R. Bhakti Klein wrote:
>
> > Well, it's certainly not on the level of C, in terms of memory
> > allocation and other system level stuff.
>
> Certainly. But either is Java.
very true, and java is also known to be slow compared to C etc.
>
> And that doesn't mean that you shouldn't examine your code. The example I
> posted was over 300% faster...I think that sort of speed difference bears
> looking into
yes, i very much agree with that.
but i personally would rather use dot syntax, and optimize it as best as
possible, and not worry about any relative difference between that, and
if i had written it with the old syntax.
--bh
>
> --
>
> For decades we always heard that if you gave a million monkeys
> typewriters and let them bang away on the keyboard that they
> would ultimately type the complete works of Shakespeare.
>
> The Internet has proved that this is not so.
>
> -- Robert Wilensky, University of California
>
> WWW: http://www.pixelgeek.com/
>
> [To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to
> http://www.penworks.com/LUJ/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list,
> email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED])
> Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
--
R. Bhakti Klein
Lingo Programmer, Scientific Learning
http://www.ScientificLearning.com
http://www.BrainConnection.com
**
Baritone, Wicki6
http://www.wicki6.com
***
"On Earth, you can only do little things;
but you can do them with a lot of Love."
-- Mother Theresa
[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to
http://www.penworks.com/LUJ/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list,
email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
