Kerry Thompson wrote:
> Sorry, Zac, Bhakti is right on this one. Lingo is, in fact, an interpreted
> language. The tokenized format gives you a speed advantage over
> non-tokenized interpreters, but is really just an intermediate step between
> raw interpretation and a true compiled language.
Fair enough. My only experience with interpreted languages are things like
Cold Fusion, Perl or ASP where the code isn't tokenised at all.
I thought the act of creating a tokenised version of the script no longer
made it interpreted.
--
It is not enough to succeed. Others must fail.
Gore Vidal
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: http://www.pixelgeek.com/
[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to
http://www.penworks.com/LUJ/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list,
email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
