> >I ran them side-by-side on my G4 and a 600-MHz PIII, and the Windows
> >version, especially with ActiveX, ran 20-30% faster than the Mac.
>
>Might I point out that it does indeed run on the Mac.
Umm... isn't that what side-by-side implies? :-)
>Might I also suggest that everyone remember that speculation is just that.
The speculation was that it is optimized for the Pentium. I stated a
fact--that it ran faster on My P-III than my G4, roughly equivalent machines.
Now that I go back and read my post again, I see that I worded it poorly,
and it looks like I was supporting the speculation that Shockwave 3-D is
optimized for the Pentium. That's not what I intended. Terry's right--we
shouldn't engage in too much speculation. My observed difference could be
because of the video card, not the CPU--or any number of other factors.
I'm OS-agnostic--I use Mac and Windows, and like them both. I will continue
to report my observations, but I'll try to make them look less like
speculation.
Cordially,
Kerry Thompson
Learning Network
[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to
http://www.penworks.com/LUJ/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list,
email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
