"me" is the same stuff as "this" in other proglangs -> pointer to the encapsulating object, no? So it's pretty useless to store it, because it won't change - I never tried, but I even think this might be a dangerous thing to do - what happens if you try to access props of an object via the stored value after the object has been destroyed? Any volunteers? :)
> What Kerry says here is true. But why would you do that? Me is > always me whereever you use me in any method (handler) of the object. > There is no reason to have a property to keep another copy of me. [To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to http://www.penworks.com/LUJ/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
