How can I find out what is causing my problem "Connection rejected" on my sendmail. 
Could it be the disk delays or what? How can I sort out this problem because whether 
it is BogoMips or not Intel box does not reject messages but my Linux/390 does. Is the 
any way I can sort out this problem.

Please assist

Moloko

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas David Rivers [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 19 March 2002 16:24
> To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:           Re: Bogomips S390(IFL) / Intel
> 
> Philipp Knirsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Moloko Monyepao wrote:
> > > I RedHat 7.2 (Server Installation). I am currentely testing sendmail (Comparing 
>the load handling between Linux on Intel and Linux on S390. I am using an IBM z37 
>machine with one IFL and I gave my Linux LPar 80Pwt (processor weighting on the IFL)
> > > When the sever gets too busy start rejecting messages.  Just for outbount mail 
>and I also want to test for both Inbound/Outbound. What could be the problem here. I 
>will send any further information if it is needed. The following is what I got from 
>my mail administrator.
> > >
> > > This is the BogoMips rating for the various machines:
> > >
> > > Mainframe: 326.04 BogoMIPS (Mainframe)
> > > Maggie (mail-spool, 500Mhz): 996.14  (Intel) 500meg (processor)
> > >
> > > Higher is better, BogoMIPS should also be generic across platforms.
> > >
> >
> > BogoMIPS is a fairly useless speed rating for the system, especially if you even
> > start to try to use it to compare different archs. Better use some 'real'
> > benchmarks, e.g simple ones like dhrystone or similar...
> 
>  Also - your choice of compiler might make a difference (though,
>  probably not in the case of a mail server... which I can imagine
>  is I/O bound.)
> 
>  For example, Systems/C on Linux390 typically presents values that
>  are up to 20% faster than gcc for these other tests.
> 
>         - Dave Rivers -
> 
> --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]                        Work: (919) 676-0847
> Get your mainframe programming tools at http://www.dignus.com

Reply via email to