Thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: Havelock, Glenn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: General LINUX Question


Hi Bruce:

In response to the last portion of your note - regarding networking folks
being opposed to LINUX...a couple of points.

I agree that many network folks are worried about the potential of losing
their jobs because of the evolving popularity and usability of LINUX.
However, even with server consolidation, it doesn't mean every last windows
NT server will disappear. Some applications are great on LINUX running on
the mainframe, and others aren't which are suited more to NT.

One company I talked to reduced the size of their server farm. No one was
terminated on the network side. The people who used to administer the
network were asked to administer and monitor the use of LINUX on the
mainframe. Most of these people all had UNIX backgrounds, and many already
knew LINUX. Once they became aware of what could be done with LINUX on the
mainframe - and the fact that they could leverage many of their existing
skills in this environment - these people became supporters of LINUX. It was
a win-win situation: the solution was good for the company (they saved money
and increased productivity) and no one lost their jobs - the nature of their
roles changed and they got a chance to learn some new technology.

Regards,

Glenn



-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce Fry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 12:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: General LINUX Question


Anyone,

We're researching the opportunity of server consolidation through the
investment of LINUX images on our mainframe.  Is anyone aware of compiler
limitations concerning programming languages, or anything at all between
Microsoft or Unix environments to LINUX?  Several members of our Network
team are standing firmly in the ear of management exclaiming that LINUX is
something of a toy or IBM cash cow that will not perform up to Microsoft or
Unix standards.

Bruce Fry

Reply via email to