On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 03:10:23PM -0500, Peter D. Ward wrote:
> What you paint is a false dilemma.  One merely needs to correspond
> with those whose posts on Hercules indicate z/VM use, from which one
> can determine that the vast majority trade illegitimately for their own
> pecuniary purposes.

I'm not sure I believe all of this statement.

I will grant that the majority (I'm not sure how you define "vast") of
people running z/VM on Hercules are not doing so legally; other than the
IBM folks who are entitled to use it, and myself (running on Linux/390),
I'm unaware of anyone else running z/VM legally.  Still, I don't think
that the total z/VM user pool on Hercules is very large at all, and if
there are a few other people like me (or IBMmers running z/VM legally
because they're IBMmers), then "vast" may be a misnomer.

However, I don't think that the majority of these people are doing so
for their own pecuniary purposes.  I will grant that some are.

I'm curious as to how broadly you define "pecuniary purposes".  I
seriously doubt that a majority--let alone a vast majority--of the
people running z/VM on Hercules are doing so for direct financial
benefit by providing VM services on the platform.  I think that number
is very small.  I think the number of people actively developing
commercial VM apps on Hercules running z/VM is very small too.  These
are the uses I would consider "pecuniary purposes."  I do not, of
course, have any data to back up my suppositions, and anyone who would
admit in public to either of these two things in the absence of a z/VM
license for Hercules (and thus give us that data), is an idiot.

I suspect that most people running z/VM are doing it simply because they
can.  This, by the way, is the reason I run an Atari 2600 emulator on
Linux/390--I have a perfectly good (OK, OK, mostly good--one of the pins
on the left controller connector is flaky) Atari 2600 here, and I can
run Stella just fine on Linux/x86 too.  Same with Bochs and Basilisk II;
I also have much better ways to run NT or a Mac, but it's fun to see if
it'll fly.  Fact is, it's also the reason I'm running z/VM on Hercules
under Linux/390; I have no pressing problem that's being solved by
making my VM system run 100 times slower.

However, it strikes me that you may consider putting a z/VM system down
on Hercules in order to learn how to operate z/VM, and then, having done
that, selling your services as a z/VM systems programmer, to be
"pecuniary purposes."  If so, then the number probably does go up quite
a bit.  I don't view this as "pecuniary purposes," myself, any more than
I did learning Linux by playing with a Linux box and then being able to
eventually sell my Linux skills.  Do you include self-education in
"pecuniary purposes?"

Adam

Reply via email to