> Perhaps so, but if I were you, I'd visually inspect the > errlist.c file, just to be sure.
I did. Swapping the "strong" and "weak" declaration *seems* to let it build. But I then ran into other errors, so it will be some time before I will know if that fixes it. Also, I really had hoped to do this without local source code tweaks. Also also, the "stage 1" build of GLIBC works okay, so what is the difference? Film at 11. -- RMT
