BINGO! Mark ... you're a genius. Thank you. > Hmm. If the weak declaration is still in that file, then the patch was > _not_ applied. Here's what the section of code looks like on my system > after all the patches are put on:
Well ... I saw the code for myself, and it doesn't match yours. So something must have gone wrong. Sure enough, I have the patches applied in "stage 1", but never did that in the "stage 2" logic. Working on that right now. I've inserted the requisite statement in the makefile. We'll see if this does it! "Automation is everything" sez moi. But as one manager warned, just be sure you automate the right thing. -- RMT
