I'm pretty sure we understand the need. A formal SHARE requirement is unnecessary (though whether one is written is, of course, up to the user community).
Romney On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 11:37:24 -0500 Peter Webb, Toronto Transit Commission said: >Sounds like someone needs to start writing a SHARE requirement! > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Robert Morrison [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 11:31 AM >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: Re: 2074 and the HMC >> >> Actually, IBM has come close in the past. >> >> The MP3000 service element (not HMC) did provide this functionality. As >> far as I know, it was the predecessor to the 2074. In fact the >> configuration program and file in the 2074 are the same as what you would >> see in the Service element in the MP3000. >> >> You were / are able to configure a virtual channel and virtual devices via >> the microcode of the 3000 enabling you to create these 3270 sessions >> without the expense of the 2074 and or 3x74. The design of the zSeries, >> although it supports virtual coupling facility links does not have the >> same feature for it's Service elements. >> >> My hope is that some day in the not so distant future, this virtual >> feature will be there. >> >> Bob Morrison >> >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------- >> Do you Yahoo!? >> Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now
