If we were talking about a new technology, that might be relevant.

Mark Post

-----Original Message-----
From: Fargusson.Alan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 3:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Down time


On the other hand, when cars were a new technology they were not reliable or
safe.  The Model T Ford was a very popular car, yet was know to flip over if
you turned the steering wheel hard, and the had crank engine caused many
broken arms.

-----Original Message-----
From: Post, Mark K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 8:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Down time


In my company, the UNIX/Linux systems are held to a very similar standard,
because they can be.  The Windows systems are not, because they cannot live
up to it.  As time goes on, and Windows gets better (they are making some
progress, they just have a ways to go), the standard for them will be raised
as well.

In most cases, it's a matter of what people are willing to accept, and what
they're used to getting.  The joke that compares cars to (Wintel) computers
is very true in that we'd never accept that sort of unreliability from car
manufacturers.  As more and more people become aware that there are
alternatives that are more reliable, expectations will increase.  Whether
Microsoft can live up to them remains to be seen.  As technicians, our role
is to raise these questions when necessary, and use the information we have
to make the business case that money, people time, system availability,
etc., are being wasted/lost without good reason.  In many cases, that may be
doomed to failure from the beginning, but it's something I need to do so
that I can say I've done _my_ job.  Whether anyone else is willing to listen
is something I have no control over.

Mark Post

-----Original Message-----
From: Abruzzese, Pat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 10:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Down time


I know this is off the board but I would like to know why is the
"mainframe's" down time limited when the "client/servers"
seem to going down whenever. In the middle of the morning, afternoon or
night unscheduled. My VM/ESA 2.4.0 was IPL'ed 1/09/2002 and have been up
since. I will take it down this Sunday to put Z/VM 4.3.0 in service. Why are
there two sets of standards???

vr,

P. Abruzzese

Reply via email to