On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 01:35:01AM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 09:30:37PM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
> >
> > > 3. Possibly an additional tarball to run Hercules in a chroot environment.
> > > Testing changed glibc recently, and that has caused much confusion, more
> > > to come.
> >
> > Why would you want to run Hercules in a chroot environment with this type of
> > turnkey CD?
>
> My main reason to run stuff in a chroot environment is to ensure I get
> the right versions of libraries.
>
> You could make a tarball on Sarge, and I could unpack it on, lets for
> for something old, say RHL 3.0.3, and be reasonably confident it would
> run.

        But there's no real reason to make it a linux-booting CD;
        even a Windows setup (as the existing TurnKey CD has) would
        be adequate (and provides the configuration files/scripting
        for a linux-launched equivalent, too).

        So it'd be a simple setup w/ DASD images (perhaps an install
        tape image?) in CCKD w/ shadowing possible would not hurt.

        If DVD images (being 4.7GB in size) can be tolerated given
        the number of such drives becoming "standard" then a much
        larger set of installed images becomes possible.

        So it'd be set up for mainframe-ignorant folks like me that
        want to be able to work with and learn the environment.
        If there was a way to get IBM to let us sneak on copies of
        the various redbooks that would be nice too.

        The use of a turnkey tool, especially if it supports the
        Linux development environment, is that it provides an initial
        portation tool.  (I'm not naive enough to think that it'd do
        the *whole* job since you'd want to make sure it worked on
        the real metal of a mainframe at some point.)

        So, we're talking a CD that has the Hercules emulator on it
        (with an x86 linux tree as well) made to autostart in the
        Windows environment with all the neat-and-keen tools that
        the MVS 3.8 Tur(n)Key used to show the way.

        The a floppy resident linux + hercules mechanism seems a
        little bit, well, tight.

        (Imagining banks of 100 MB ZIP drives emulating 3330s...)

--
 John R. Campbell             Speaker to Machines                 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  "As a SysAdmin, yes, I CAN read your e-mail, but I DON'T get that bored!"-me
   Disclaimer:  All opinions expressed above are those of John Campbell and
                do not reflect the opinions of his employer(s) or lackeys.
                Anyone who says differently is itching for a fight!

Reply via email to