Which was...In order for Microsoft to protect themselves from the Worm,
they switched to Linux rather than
using/fixing their Windows servers. At least that's what I gathered from
the article.
Ryan Ware
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ic.com> To
Sent by: Linux on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
390 Port cc
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IST.EDU> Subject
Re: Microsoft beats the blaster
08/18/2003 08:49
AM
Please respond to
Linux on 390 Port
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IST.EDU>
Which was?
I realize the whole blaster thing is egg on Microsoft's secure computing
initiative face, and that Windows itself is a playground for kiddies.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Summerfield [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 8:44 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Microsoft beats the blaster
>
> On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Ryan Ware wrote:
>
> > Microsoft has used Akamai for eons for downloads of all sorts. I find
> it
> > amusing that people think that Microsoft would have an issue with using
> a
> > linux server for something. I guess this
> > http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph?site=www.linuxworldexpo.com is
> amusing
> > also.
>
> Perhaps you missed a key point.
>
>
> --
>
>
> Cheers
> John.
>
> Join the "Linux Support by Small Businesses" list at
> http://mail.computerdatasafe.com.au/mailman/listinfo/lssb
> Copyright John Summerfield. Reproduction prohibited.
