I like that. Reminds me of an old Windows program called "First Aid" that tried to help catch failures better than Windows itself did. My friends raved about it, but it never worked that well for me.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > Alan Altmark > Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 3:32 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] Memory access faults. > > > On Tuesday, 10/28/2003 at 01:43 CST, Adam Thornton > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >In any event, what *is* the correct behavior? > > +------------------------------------------+ > | Application Failure | > | Program XYZ has failed. Because it did | > | not register for automatic failure | > | reporting, there really isn't much you | > | can do about it. But if you're really | > | curious, you can look at the registers | > | and a disassembly of 100 bytes | > | surrounding the failure. Feel free to | > | curse and pound on the desk in anger. | > | It won't help. Really. | > | | > | After 1 minute, CANCEL will be selected. | > | | > | +--------+ +--------+ +-------+ | > | | Look | | Cancel | |restart| | > | | inside | | | | pgm | | > | +--------+ +--------+ +-------+ | > | | > +------------------------------------------+ > > > Chuckie >
