If you're going that low, Jetty must be a whole lot less memory hungry than WebSphere.
On Tue, 2004-01-27 at 09:51, Adam Thornton wrote: > On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 09:41:04AM -0600, Rich Smrcina wrote: > > Jetty, being a servlet engine might be wildcard (as WebSphere virtual > > machines typically are). I might start with 512MB machines and monitor > > it from there. > > Start smaller, say at 192MB or 256MB, and increase it as necessary. > Give all your machines plenty of swap on V-DISK. You want to have your > machines (preferably) not-quite into swap, or just a little into swap. > If you do a "free", the "free" column on the second row (that is, the > one that shows how much is free if you count buffers and cache as free) > should be small. > > Even if your Linux machines don't take up all your physical memory even > with no overcommittal, as long as you've got plenty of swap defined on > VDIS and plenty of memory to back it up, you're better off than you are > with too-large Linux machines. > > Adam -- Rich Smrcina Sr. Systems Engineer DSG Linux Services Milwaukee, WI rsmrcina at wi.rr.com rsmrcina at dsgroup.com Catch the WAVV! Stay for requirements and the free-for-all. Update your zSeries skills in 4 days for a very reasonable price. WAVV 2004 in Chattanooga, TN April 30-May 4, 2004 For details see http://www.wavv.org
