On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 10:05:53AM -0600, Rich Smrcina wrote: > If you're going that low, Jetty must be a whole lot less memory hungry > than WebSphere.
WebSphere itself only ("only"!) uses about 60MB. I guess that Jetty is
much lighter weight than *that*.
Space above that is what your Java developers think they need to get
work done.
Adam
