> I was waiting for Sir Santa to jump in and tell about Unsolicited File > Transfer ?
I was waiting for the invitation! ;-) UFT does over IP the same thing conceptually that NJE does over SNA or leased lines, and does so without the need to administer additional network topology. (While NJE over IP is great, and would be my choice for connecting VM-to-VM, you do have the burden of yet-another-network-topology to think about.) > There's client and server for CMS, Linux, Windows (and probably his Palm > too). How much effort would one in USS be? And there is UFT support in RSCS. UFT runs just fine on USS. I don't have access to USS resources to build it for the purpose of distribution. That is, it would not be right to use my employer's machine to generate USS executables. But otherwise the code should compile and run quite nicely. The "-a" flag on the 'sf' command works as intended when run under USS, converting EBCDIC plain text to ASCII plain text while sending. So maybe someone would offer to build it and contrib that back. > PS Heavy use may encourage Endicott to fix the client portion in > SENDFILE ;-) And that would be great. The downside to UFT is the lack of a good RDRLIST equiv on Unix/Linux. Time! Time! There's just never enough time! -- R; ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
