This is what I was hoping, also. I stand corrected. Scott L.
-----Original Message----- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ferguson, Neale Sent: Friday, June 18, 2004 12:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: J2EE performance? I was really hoping that a zAAP would be a bit more interesting than just a co-processor running S/390/zSeries code. I had visions of a processor that executed the Java bytecodes directly (or via "millicode" anyway). -----Original Message----- The zAAP feature isn't needed for Linux as you can just add another processor for the same cost as a zAAP. It saves money on z/OS because the maintenance cost go up if you add another regular processor, but not if you add a zAAP. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
