<snip>
By which you imply what, exactly?
</snip>
This is ridiculous. I haven't implied anything. I haven't
characterized anybody as anything. Nor have I stated what my opinion of
Maureen what's-her-name is. (For the record, she clearly was irresponsible and
I think she should have been fired. I also think legal action should be taken,
but that is for the injured party to decide.) I have simply seen too much
pro-linux/anti-linux/pro-Microsoft/anti-Microsoft/pro-Apple/anti-Apple/pro-IBM/anti-IBM/ad
nauseam zealotry to regard any particular camp as somehow saintlike. If
someone thinks otherwise, that's great, but he needs to lurk around slashdot
for a couple months before becoming too confident in the moral high ground of
whatever group he chooses.
I will never for the life of me understand why people get so
emotionally invested in an operation system and the culture that surrounds it
that they are willing to vilify anyone who thinks otherwise, but that seems to
be the way the world works these days.
<snip>
If you don't know these people, then you probably ought not characterize
them as "pro-SCO" or "anti-SCO".
</snip>
"Pro-SCO" was taken from the title of the OP.
Jon
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
