On 10/11/06, Alan Altmark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From what I understand of the announcement, it appears to me this is > sort of the built-in version and uses other references than a dial-up > to Boulder. If that's correct, then z/VM and Linux would still be able > to take advantage in the same way. Correct. Think of it as a built-in 9037, with a variety of external synchronization options, including NTP.
Which means that z/VM for most practical purposes can take advantage of a TOD that runs on time, but z/VM just does not know about how good it is? If so, would it not be nice to say so in the announcement? Or is this Chuckie's evil twin who works in another department of the company and still thinks it is good to suggest z/VM development has stopped years ago and we don't bother to support new stuff ? Rob ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
