Sure, it wastes a little, but it doesn't look that bad here (we have to
run NTP on every server to sync security tickets and stuff).  Velocity
reports the idle ones at 0.01% of a CPU, and that's with their agent
presumbaly doing a little stuff too).


Marcy Cortes


"This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information.
If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the
addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on
this message or any information herein.  If you have received this
message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail
and delete this message.  Thank you for your cooperation."


-----Original Message-----
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
David Boyes
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 12:46 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] Server Time Protocol support for zSeries

> > Why does Linux/zSeries need STP? I know that my home system can use
XNTP
> > to set its clock (which I do daily). Can't XNTP be used for Linux on

> > zSeries just as it is for all other Linux platforms? If not, why
not?

NTP causes every guest to wake up periodically to process time updates,
which waste resources (NTP is not a particularly lightweight protocol). 

Not allowing VM to participate forces Linux to handle this individually
(rather than doing it in common and allowing the Linuxen to handle it
from the TOD clock offsets maintained by CP). 

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or
visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390

Reply via email to