>>> On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 12:30 PM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Quillen, Channon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > # cat /proc/dasd/devices > 0.0.0200(ECKD) at ( 94: 0) is dasda : active at blocksize: > 4096, 90000 blocks, 351 MB > 0.0.0201(ECKD) at ( 94: 4) is dasdb : active at blocksize: > 4096, 601020 blocks, 2347 MB > 0.0.0202(ECKD) at ( 94: 8) is dasdc : active at blocksize: > 4096, 601020 blocks, 2347 MB > 0.0.0203(ECKD) at ( 94: 12) is dasdd : active at blocksize: > 4096, 601020 blocks, 2347 MB > 0.0.0204(ECKD) at ( 94: 16) is dasde : active at blocksize: > 4096, 601020 blocks, 2347 MB > 0.0.0205(ECKD) at ( 94: 20) is dasdf : active at blocksize: > 4096, 601020 blocks, 2347 MB > 0.0.0206(ECKD) at ( 94: 24) is dasdg : active at blocksize: > 4096, 601020 blocks, 2347 MB > 0.0.0222(FBA ) at ( 94: 28) is dasdh : active at blocksize: > 512, 20480 blocks, 10 MB > 0.0.0223(FBA ) at ( 94: 32) is dasdi : active at blocksize: > 512, 204800 blocks, 100 MB > > dasdh and dasdi are both swap, and they appear to be used as such: > # swapon -s > Filename Type Size > Used Priority > /dev/dasdh1 partition 10184 0 50 > /dev/dasdi1 partition 102256 14968 100
Yes, but they're FBA devices, not ECKD, so dasdfmt isn't needed for them, and won't work with them. Mark Post ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
