Not exactly. They seem to be stored in the filesystem (and I think this is documented in one of the ZFS references).
If you have a security product like TopSecret then you can set ACLs with setfacl, and list them with getfacl, however they don't actually do anything. I tested this to make sure. -----Original Message----- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Chase, John Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 12:38 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Copying ACLs from USS to z/Linux > -----Original Message----- > From: Linux on 390 Port On Behalf Of McKown, John > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Linux on 390 Port On Behalf Of Mark Post > > > > Does anyone know for sure if the USS pax command will preserve ACLs? > > Yes, it will. I have done so for backup purposes on z/OS > under 1.6 and 1.8. I don't guarantee that they will restore > properly under Linux, however as I have not tried that. You sure about that? As I understand it, ACLs are a "RACF (security product) artifact", not a "file permission". -jc- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email from the State of California is for the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review or use, including disclosure or distribution, is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy all copies of this email. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
