Patrick Spinler wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
| North, Quinn wrote:
|> That being said, Linux can do ACL's just fine. They work the same way
|> on both systems (albeit with a slight syntax change in the command).
|> The big assumption here is that the two will be compatible. I figured
|> I'd post out on the list to see if anyone had done something similar
|> before. We can't be the only shop using ACL's ... can we??
We do use ACLs on linux fairly heavily, and they work well for us. I
just didn't know anything about z/OS HFS ACL's.
The only issue I'm aware of for using ACL's on linux was already
mentioned: many standard backup tools don't back up or restore them.
Caveat emptor, I guess.
My concern is that, however USS stores them, it's not the same way Linux
does.
If there is any difference, a new plan is called for.
--
Cheers
John
-- spambait
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Advice
http://webfoot.com/advice/email.top.php
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375
You cannot reply off-list:-)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
