On Tuesday, 02/05/2008 at 09:40 EST, David Boyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There are some good arguments for doing the NJE processing directly in > the Linux guest if you're dealing with personal information (no chance > for it to be intercepted in the VM spooling area).
Red herring. The contents of a virtual machine are potentially on dasd at any time, so the choice of protocol is not relevant to security. > (VSE is so much better behaved as a VM guest. Would it really be such a > big deal to add VM UR device support to z/OS permanently? *sigh*) Have you opened a PMR with z/OS (JES2?) support to indicate that <whatever> isn't working when running as a guest? They sure aren't going to change anything unless people open up PMRs. Tell two friends. Tell them to tell two friends. Not that Alan would advocate a letter-writing campaign, the goody-two-.... <gurgle> Sorry about that. He got out when I wasn't looking. Alan Altmark z/VM Development IBM Endicott ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
