Marcy Cortes wrote: >We used to use Levanta (now out of business) whose mapfs was based on >unionfs. We didn't see any CPU reduction when we converted off of it. >It did use a lot of CPU at shutdown time, but that may have been more >of a bug than a necessity ;)
For PoE* reasons, I'm obliged to point out that MapFS was not based on UnionFS -- it predated its existence and was developed entirely in-house, by Nate Stahl. Not that it matters, or that anyone (quite possibly including Nate) cares any more... ...phsiii * Purity of Essence -- Google it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
