On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Richard Gasiorowski <[email protected]> wrote:

> Rob has a good point in resource usage and with GC it definitely is the
> lesser of two evils.  I have never had an instance where after determining
> the GC Collector settings performance and % utilization suffered
> negatively.  One can also look at GC as being Java feeble attempt at
> memory management.

I recently heard someone claim "one might find classic programs spend
30% of their CPU in malloc() / free() calls and tasks that would
otherwise be provided by the JVM"   But he's a true Java person, so I
would like to see some data...

OTOH I was working with a customer recently who was fighting the
embedded DB2 inside his TSM 6 server. Apparently DB2 could not decide
whether to keep the block or give it back to Linux. After changing a
memory threshold in DB2, he got back a lot of system time in Linux...

Rob
-- 
Rob van der Heij
Velocity Software
http://www.velocitysoftware.com/

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information on Linux on System z, visit
http://wiki.linuxvm.org/

Reply via email to