On Thursday, 05/24/2018 at 12:45 GMT, Rick Troth <[email protected]> wrote: > On 05/23/2018 07:25 PM, R P Herrold wrote: > >> Suse just released a new kernel-default-4.4.131-94.29-1 > >> package for SLES 12SP3 with some kernel security fixes. If > >> you use XFS, don't install it! > > My condolences > > > > There has been an (at least) four way finger pointing contest > > raging for the last couple of months (on the Fedoraproject > > front) between: > > - xfs developers > > - systemd developers > > - dracut developers > > - innocent victims of XFS > > ----- snip ----- > > Explain to me how a KERNEL update relates to a finger-pointing fest > among three user-space packages and the users? > > I DO use XFS on some systems. I prolly fall into the fourth group, but > was already pointing my digits at that second bullet.
Explain to me why a distro would release an update that knowingly breaks a file system? Unless they don't support xfs? Alan Altmark Senior Managing z/VM and Linux Consultant IBM Systems Lab Services IBM Z Delivery Practice ibm.com/systems/services/labservices office: 607.429.3323 mobile; 607.321.7556 [email protected] IBM Endicott ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For more information on Linux on System z, visit http://wiki.linuxvm.org/
