David Murn wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Apr 1999, Joshua E. Rodd wrote:
> > The GEM code is neat, and it *is* GPL'd, so maybe we can play
> > with it, but it's always more fun to write our own code than
> > port. =)
> Sure, it's more fun, but if you port code, then you can actually get some
> sort of relatively fast turnover of applications.

True.

Porting GEM looks hard, though.

Reply via email to