> > The GEM code is neat, and it *is* GPL'd, so maybe we can play > > with it, but it's always more fun to write our own code than > > port. =) > > Sure, it's more fun, but if you port code, then you can actually get some > sort of relatively fast turnover of applications. GEM is btw pretty limited. You can't for example draw except to the top window in most versions of GEM
- Re: GEM (WAS Re: vgalib) Jakob Eriksson
- Re: GEM (WAS Re: vgalib) David Given
- Re: GEM (WAS Re: vgalib) Jakob Eriksson
- Re: GEM (WAS Re: vgalib) David Given
- Re: GEM (WAS Re: vgalib) Joshua E. Rodd
- Re: GEM (WAS Re: vgalib) David Murn
- Re: GEM (WAS Re: vgalib) Joshua E. Rodd
- Re: GEM (WAS Re: vgalib) Shawn T. Rutledge
- Re: GEM (WAS Re: vgalib) David C.S. Prior
- Re: GEM (WAS Re: vgalib) Luke(boo) Farrar
- Re: ELKS Networking: TCP/IP? Alan Cox
- Re: ELKS Networking: TCP/IP? Michael G Hughes
