On Wed, 12 May 1999, Greg Haerr wrote: > The point about ELKS being currently limited to 64k code is a very good > one. I think we're kind of nearing that limit, aren't we? Depending on how you look at it, it's already been crossed. If you compile in all of the options on the kernel (serial, parallel, module, TCP/IP, etc.) you won't be able to link. Yuck! Shane
- Re: NanoX version 0.3 released Shane Kerr
- Re: NanoX version 0.3 released Alan Cox
- RE: NanoX version 0.3 released Greg Haerr
- Re: NanoX version 0.3 released Ross Vandegrift
- RE: NanoX version 0.3 released Greg Haerr
- Re: NanoX version 0.3 released Eric J. Korpela
- Re: NanoX version 0.3 released Alistair Riddoch
- RE: NanoX version 0.3 released Greg Haerr
- RE: NanoX version 0.3 released Greg Haerr
- RE: NanoX version 0.3 released Greg Haerr
- RE: NanoX version 0.3 released Shane Kerr
- RE: NanoX version 0.3 released David Murn
- RE: NanoX version 0.3 released Riley Williams
- RE: NanoX version 0.3 released Greg Haerr
- Re: NanoX version 0.3 released Ansel
- Re: NanoX version 0.3 released David Murn
- Re: NanoX version 0.3 released Alistair Riddoch
- Re: NanoX version 0.3 released Dan Olson
- Re: NanoX version 0.3 released Jakob Eriksson
- RE: NanoX version 0.3 released Greg Haerr
- Re: NanoX version 0.3 released Alistair Riddoch
