----- Original Message ----- From: Greg Haerr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: 'Bradley D. LaRonde' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 04, 1999 2:51 PM Subject: RE: Request for comments - Microwindows > > : However, it does appear to kill the static model, but ONLY FOR NON-FREE > : ROGRAMS. Free programs could still use the static model just fine, and > : non-free programs could still use the client/server model, since the client > : side is LGPL. > : > Well, we could always have LGPL for static model, otherwise > GPL for server and LGPL for applications. If someone wants to develop > a non-free program, and link it statically, we still let them Wow, I never thought of that possibility. One thought, though, is that it might convolute things too much to #ifdef the licensing. Regards, Brad
- Re: Request for comments - Microwindows Alan Cox
- Re: Request for comments - Microwindows Jamie Howard
- Re: Request for comments - Microwindows Alex Holden
- Re: Request for comments - Microwindows Alex Holden
- Re: Request for comments - Microwindows Vidar Hokstad
- RE: Request for comments - Microwindows Greg Haerr
- Re: Request for comments - Microwindows Bradley D. LaRonde
- Re: Request for comments - Microwindows Alan Cox
- RE: Request for comments - Microwindows Greg Haerr
- Re: Request for comments - Microwindows Bradley D. LaRonde
- Re: Request for comments - Microwindows Vidar Hokstad
- Re: Request for comments - Microwindows Alan Cox
- Re: Request for comments - Microwindows Bradley D. LaRonde
- Re: Request for comments - Microwindows Alex Holden
- Re: Request for comments - Microwindows Bradley D. LaRonde
- Re: Request for comments - Microwindow... Alex Holden
- Re: Request for comments - Microw... Bradley D. LaRonde
- Re: Request for comments - Mi... Alex Holden
- Re: Request for comments - Microwindows Alex Holden
