Yes, I got one last week when I re: to a message.

cristi

At 08:53 AM 6/12/00 +1200, Rod Boyce wrote:
Does anybody else get these messages when trying to reply to the Linux-8086
list?
 
I most defiantly have not subscribed to whatever this is.
 
Regards,
Rod Boyce.
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Natasha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, 12 June 2000 08:46
To: Rod Boyce
Subject: Your recent message to Topica.com


You recently sent a message,



RE: Building ELKS



to Linux-Lizard.  This is a restricted list, which means that only

subscribers of the list can post to it.  Our records indicate that you

are not a member of the list.



If you would like more information about this list, or you would like to

join the list, you can go to the Topica web site ( http://www.topica.com)
<http://www.topica.com)>

and search for the list.



Topica's site also has thousands of lists you can join. See

for yourself at:  http://www.topica.com <http://www.topica.com>  You can
check out our

collection of great TipWorld tips at:

http://www.topica.com/tipworld?system1
<http://www.topica.com/tipworld?system1>



Questions about the service? Check out Topica's Help

section at  http://www.topica.com <http://www.topica.com>  -- just click on
"help"

at the bottom of the screen.



Still have questions? Email Topica at [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Please include the email address of the list you're

inquiring about, and the email address you use to

subscribe to the list.



Sincerely,

Topica Customer Support



-------------------------------

+++++ Original Message ++++++++

-------------------------------



Return-Path:

Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Received: (qmail 13786 invoked by alias); 11 Jun 2000 20:46:08 -0000

Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Received: (qmail 13781 invoked by uid 0); 11 Jun 2000 20:46:07 -0000

Received: from nic.funet.fi (193.166.0.145)

  by inmta007.topica.com with SMTP; 11 Jun 2000 20:46:07 -0000

Received: from vger.rutgers.edu ([128.6.190.2]:15145 "EHLO vger.rutgers.edu"

        ident: "NO-IDENT-SERVICE[2]" smtp-auth:  TLS-CIPHER: )

        by nic.funet.fi with ESMTP id ;

        Sun, 11 Jun 2000 23:44:30 +0300

Received: by vger.rutgers.edu via listexpand id ;

        Sun, 11 Jun 2000 16:43:02 -0400

Received: by vger.rutgers.edu id ;

        Sun, 11 Jun 2000 16:42:19 -0400

Received: from smtp.dmcwave.co.nz ([202.27.34.6]:1601 "EHLO
smtp.dmcwave.co.nz")

        by vger.rutgers.edu with ESMTP id ;

        Sun, 11 Jun 2000 16:38:21 -0400

Received: by EXCHWENZ01 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)

        id ; Mon, 12 Jun 2000 08:38:04 +1200

Message-ID: <9DCCE20055ACD311BBE200104B08D834742D23@EXCHWENZ01>

From:   Rod Boyce

Cc:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Subject: RE: Building ELKS

Date:   Mon, 12 Jun 2000 08:37:12 +1200

MIME-Version: 1.0

X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)

Content-Type: text/plain;

        charset="iso-8859-1"

To:     unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)

Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Precedence: bulk

X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



What about the low end embedded applications.  Say for instance a small PDA

type device.  Or my own application I have a mobile robotic platform with a

tight power budget and I have found an NEC V25 SBC to operate it (this board

draws 100mA).  The OS I will have a look at is going to be ELKS for its

small size and ability to run on an XT.  I challenge you to find me a 486 or

68000 SBC to match or better it...



While this project may only be for my benefit and is not a commercial

product I certainly expect it to further my career.





Regards,

Rod Boyce



                -----Original Message-----

                From:   Blaz Antonic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

                Sent:   Sunday, 11 June 2000 04:31

                To:     David Lloyd-Jones

                Cc:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]

                Subject:        Re: Building ELKS



                > > Does anybody have any success stories to share off of

this list regarding

                > > the installation process of ELKS, and on what specie of

computer they did

                > it on?

                >

                > No. Nobody.



                That's not very funny. Of course the whole thing works ..

it's just that

                i am unable to see much (any ?) use for it nowadays; it made

some sense

                5 years ago but doesn't make any now.  It is good source to

learn OS

                basics from though.



                                                bye, Ab

Reply via email to