Linux-Advocacy Digest #619, Volume #29 Thu, 12 Oct 00 16:13:05 EDT
Contents:
Re: Blatant anti-MS trolling... (Andres Soolo)
Re: Migration --> NT costing please :-) ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Unix rules in Redmond ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: What I would like to see in an OS: ("Santiago Sainz")
Re: Unix rules in Redmond ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: The Power of the Future! ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: The Power of the Future! ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: The Power of the Future! ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Andres Soolo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Blatant anti-MS trolling...
Date: 12 Oct 2000 18:55:01 GMT
Todd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The really funny thing is, WHY are you using Hotmail then?? You come in
> here in a Linux advocacy group, whining about Hotmail. Hotmail is a *FREE*
> service. You *CHOOSE* to use it. If *YOU* don't like it, then *YOU* can
> *CHOOSE* to use something *ELSE*!
Well, if they're claiming it's a mail service, it better be one. Currently,
it's just serving what MS is best at: nothingness. And false marketing
IS something for .advocacy :-)
Disclaimer: I haven't used Hotmail since MS bought it so I can't say
whether it currently actually works or not.
> If you wanted a reliable email service, then you would have done so already
> and not complain and whine about Hotmail. Otherwise, you are probably just
> a troll.
but Hotmail claims to be a reliable email service.
--
Andres Soolo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
We cannot do everything at once, but we can do something at once.
-- Calvin Coolidge
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: Migration --> NT costing please :-)
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 15:57:51 -0400
Drestin Black wrote:
>
> "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >
> > No wonder you absolutely fucking REFUSE to reveal your name.
>
> Poor baby.
Any man who believes in his opinions should have no problem posting
under his real name.
The fact that you don't reveals that you know that you're posting
bullshit, and are scared shitless that any company in Detroit would
ever find out your real name....isn't it.
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
ICQ # 3056642
http://directedfire.com/greatgungiveaway/directedfire.referrer.fcgi?2632
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (D) above.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: Unix rules in Redmond
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 15:58:23 -0400
Drestin Black wrote:
>
> "." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:8s1qj7$tn7$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > In comp.os.linux.advocacy Drestin Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > "Gary Hallock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > >> Drestin Black wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > "." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > >> > news:8ru4kt$1du$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > >> > > In comp.os.linux.advocacy Chad Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > "." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > >> > > > news:8rtqq8$1lap$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > >> > > >> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Chad Myers
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > >> >> You're right, dresden. How could I have ever doubted you.
> > > IBM's
> > >> > 4096
> > >> > > >> >> processor mainframe solution will never be able to hold a
> candle
> > > to
> > >> > W2K
> > >> > > >> >> running on 32 processors.
> > >> > > >> >>
> > >> > > >> >> Yep.
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> > Then why hasn't IBM entered this beast into the running and
> nuked
> > >> > > >> > all the competition?
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> Because its not a "web solution", though it can be used as such.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > TPC doesn't meter "web solution"s, it meters transactions for all
> > >> > > > sorts of things. Namely, financial transactions, manufacturing
> > >> > transactions,
> > >> > > > just about any type of transactional processing etc. What exactly
> do
> > >> > these
> > >> > > > beasts do if they do not process anything? Granted some due
> science
> > >> > > > and mathematical calculations, but is that all? Why would
> > > transactional
> > >> > > > processing metrics not apply to them.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > >> There are alot of companies which make enormous machines that
> are
> > > fully
> > >> > > >> capable of blowing everything that compaq makes completely away.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > But they haven't?
> > >> > >
> > >> > > You're right chad. As right as dresden. Theres no way a 4096
> > > processor
> > >> > > mainframe could ever beat a compaq machine.
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> > Perhaps it could. But has it yet? Does IBM have a 4096 processor
> machine
> > > up
> > >> > and running and able to actually perform a benchmark so we can
> compare
> > > it to
> > >> > something useful? I mean, if IBM has this killer rig out there - why
> > > don't
> > >> > they fire up a TPC score and completely utterly blow both MS and
> compaq
> > > (and
> > >> > sun) so far outta the water that we'll all just cringe at the mere
> > > mention
> > >> > of it's name (which you've never stated, by the way).
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> ASCI White. Developed and built in the building next to where I work.
> > >>
> > >> http://www.llnl.gov/asci/platforms/white/
> > >>
> > >> It was delivered a couple of months ago.
> > >>
> > >> Gary
> > >>
> >
> > > That is VERY cool Gary - even the picture is sweet!! :)
> >
> > > (there is a picture of the Compaq cluster than set the new TPC-C record
> in
> > > e-week this week but it pales in comparison).
> >
> > > And I see it's 8192, not 4096 processors....
> >
> > I wasnt talking about an ASCII series machine, dresden. IBM makes a
> couple of
> > very high end hunks of hardware.
>
> I wasn't talking to you.
>
> >
> > > I never doubted there is
> > > hardware better/faster/bigger than this compaq cluster - but not as
> > > abracadabra was presenting it and certainly not tested in this fashion.
> I'll
> > > look forward to more from IBM...
> >
> > You'll never see it. The ASCII series has been around for a number of
> years;
> > AFAIK the S/* series alot longer. They have never been put to any of your
> > tests. They dont need to be; the sorts of people that buy them arent
> interested.
>
> I love it: "We here at IBM have machines SO powerful you don't even need to
> test them or have our claims independently verified. You don't need to know
> how we compare to others. We say it's good and we charge you good enough so,
> damnit, don't use your own brain, just trust us, give us your money. We say
> it's great! Honest! No, REALLY it is. Testing? Bah! Benchmarks? Who needs
> them? We're IBM - we can't do anything wrong..."
Yeah...that sounds like IBM.
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
ICQ # 3056642
http://directedfire.com/greatgungiveaway/directedfire.referrer.fcgi?2632
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (D) above.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "Santiago Sainz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: What I would like to see in an OS:
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 19:57:25 GMT
> 1. Linux Kernel
I think it is nowadays lacking what I'd like a computer to do
for me, as every OS today.
> 2. Standardised GUI, either, MacOS or Windows like interface
I'd like voice recognition as the only user interfaz, and talking to
me as the main output device, with a 3D device for diagrams :)
> 3. Simplified Library structure similar to what Amiga had (ie,
> icons.library, fonts.library, printers.library)
I'd mind nothing libraries as it would stay updatded by itself
using the net.
> 4. ReiserFS as the file system
Well ... may be ...
> 5. A windows interpreter, when a program makes a call it goes through a
> filter (like wine) and matchs the windows dll call with the UNIX
> equivilant.
Windows ? What for ? :-)
> Both Windows and Linux have great attributes, Linux, opensourced and
> very stable. Windows, easy to use and administrate. By combining the
> power of a UNIX core and the simplicity of the Windows GUI there would
> be a balance between simplicity, functionality and flexibility. (a
> concept very similar to the MacOS X project).
Well, yes, I'd like it to be open source for the case people wanted to
improve it :-)
> feel free to reply, no flaming please.
Typing, no voice for me yet :)
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: Unix rules in Redmond
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 15:59:38 -0400
Drestin Black wrote:
>
> "." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:8s1qbu$tn7$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > In comp.os.linux.advocacy Drestin Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > "." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > news:8s01oc$1c61$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > >> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Drestin Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> So, again: where is Compaq's machine that can do 160TPM?
> > >>
> > >> > So, again: who cares?
> > >>
> > >> Apparantly you only care about performance up to and including the very
> > > top
> > >> of compaq's product line.
> >
> > > No - I just don't care for the comparison. I don't see the value anymore
> of
> > > a large, expensive, monolithic uni-server solution any more in todays
> > > models.
> >
> > >>
> > >> > Do we say: "Ah, Google with Linux is so pathetic, they
> > >> > have to use clusters! ahahhaha." then add: "Show me the single linux
> box
> > >> > that can run Google"?
> > >>
> > >> An IBM S/390 64x64. Theyve even got cool light up blue stripes down
> the
> > > side.
> >
> > > Again... if the choice is SOOoooOooOoo obvious - Google must be pathetic
> > > idiots not to take the simple route then eh? I'm sure it's not easier to
> > > manage thousands of linux boxes intead of one pretty shiny IBM?
> >
> > Its alot harder actually, but they had already bought into that
> architecture
> > in an extreme way; there would have been an enormous non-hardware related
> > cost to switch.
>
> Gee, you mean like moving from BSD and Solaris to W2K ala Hotmail - now...
More like moving from BSD to Solaris to W2k (aborted) back to Solaris
ala HOTMAIL
> lesse, why was it they had to wait and it took some time? Funny how you
> can't make that connection when it's good for MS but when it saves unix it's
> OK?
I dare you to post this crap under your real name.
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
ICQ # 3056642
http://directedfire.com/greatgungiveaway/directedfire.referrer.fcgi?2632
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (D) above.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy
Subject: Re: The Power of the Future!
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 16:00:23 -0400
Drestin Black wrote:
>
> "Dolly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Drestin Black wrote:
> > >
> > > "Dolly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > > Drestin Black wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > W2K is running 100% of the web servers at Hotmail but the
> application
> > > itself
> > > > > has not yet been ported. Look for that to change before the year is
> out.
> > > >
> > > > www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,2610894,00.html
> > >
> > > Yes, that link just verifies what I already said. Thank you.
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Here's a far older message that MS keeps changing the
> > > > date on and revamping...
> > > > www.microsoft.com/ntserver/web/news/msnw/Hotmail.asp
> > >
> > > Hmm... the date is STILL May 1, 1998 - just like it was when they first
> > > posted it on... May 1, 1998. The text is the same as it was then too. In
> > > fact, it needs to be updated to reflect the change to W2K.
> > >
> >
> >
> > No - see you missed the whole point. In
> > May 1998, they were pretending the
> > migration was near done. It was later
> > announced that such had not worked and
> > that HotMail was running Solaris and BSD
> > with forays into re-attempting usage of
> > NT (specifically the new W2K). And
> > that was from announcements 2 years later.
>
> No, you are simply wrong. They NEVER pretended anything in May 1998. it was
> NEVER announced that it never worked because they never tried in the first
> place! You fail to document ANY of your lies.
So, you admit that Microsoft never did Migrate hotmail to MS LoseDows.
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
ICQ # 3056642
http://directedfire.com/greatgungiveaway/directedfire.referrer.fcgi?2632
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (D) above.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy
Subject: Re: The Power of the Future!
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 16:06:53 -0400
Drestin Black wrote:
>
> "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Drestin Black wrote:
> > >
> > > "Jason Bowen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > news:8rvoft$nc7$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > > In article <39e2aab3$0$5789$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > > > Drestin Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > <snip> >
> > > > >W2K is running 100% of the web servers at Hotmail but the application
> > > itself
> > > > >has not yet been ported. Look for that to change before the year is
> out.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I berated somebody for making an inference about Hotmail's poor
> > > > performance lately but now I guess maybe I was wrong. I rarely deal
> with
> > > > Hotmail addresses but of late the few I've dealt with took 3-4 hours
> to
> > > > receive mail that I sent. I guess corporate decision making doesn't
> take
> > > > into account that if something ain't broke, don't fix it.
> > >
> > > I'm not certain I got this right so if I'm wrong forgive me. Are you
> saying
> > > that hotmail is slower now that it's on W2K than before? and when you/I
> say
> > > slower here you mean in the time to deliver mail?
> > >
> > > If that is so then I think you don't realize that you have further
> > > reenforced the nickname for Solaris "slowaris" because it's the Solaris
> > > portion of Hotmail that handles the actual routing/delivery of mail -
> NOT
> > > the W2K/IIS front end server pool.
> > >
> > > yes, i would agree that the reason they are fixing the hotmail
> application
> > > is because solaris cannot scale well enough to handle the loads hotmail
> > > generates.
> >
> > Liar.
> >
> > M$ tried to migrate hotmail FROM Solaris to a wannabe M$-OS, and it
> > failed big time (just like on the previous attempts).
> >
> > Solaris can handle the load
> > LoseNT can't
> > Lose2K can't
> >
> > Hope that helps, liar.
> >
>
> You are the fool and idiot. You cannot prove anything whatsoever.
Personal observation in the workplace is sufficient.
> Prove their attempt to migrate at any time.
They certainly ballyhood the "upcoming" event in their announcements.
> Prove their attempt to migrate and failure at any time.
They had to abandon the product becuase it was a fiasco.
> W2K obviously can handle the load because the same
> number of servers that ran hotmail under BSD are now running a larger load
> under W2K (same hardware, better results). And, look for Slowaris to be
> replaced at hotmail before years end...
W2K can handle the load, but Microsoft is NOT migrating the servers
at Hotmail (an MS property) and it didn't fail because they never
attempted to migrate Hotmail.
Yeah, Drestin. You keep telling yourself that.
No wonder you refuse to post this shit under your real name...
you'd be laughed out of business.
>
> I can prove that BSD was replaced by W2K successfully at Hotmail - what can
> you prove other than your often repeated .sig (and I quote):
You really are fascinated with Knackos.
Tell us, Drestin...was that another one of your pseudonyms as
you post in the middle of the night from under your bed?
>
> >G: Knackos...you're a retard.
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
ICQ # 3056642
http://directedfire.com/greatgungiveaway/directedfire.referrer.fcgi?2632
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (D) above.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy
Subject: Re: The Power of the Future!
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 16:08:06 -0400
Drestin Black wrote:
>
> "Mike Byrns" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > "Aaron R. Kulkis" wrote:
> >
> > > Drestin Black wrote:
> > > >
> > > > "Jason Bowen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > > news:8rvoft$nc7$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > > > In article <39e2aab3$0$5789$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > > > > Drestin Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > <snip> >
> > > > > >W2K is running 100% of the web servers at Hotmail but the
> application
> > > > itself
> > > > > >has not yet been ported. Look for that to change before the year is
> out.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I berated somebody for making an inference about Hotmail's poor
> > > > > performance lately but now I guess maybe I was wrong. I rarely deal
> with
> > > > > Hotmail addresses but of late the few I've dealt with took 3-4 hours
> to
> > > > > receive mail that I sent. I guess corporate decision making doesn't
> take
> > > > > into account that if something ain't broke, don't fix it.
> > > >
> > > > I'm not certain I got this right so if I'm wrong forgive me. Are you
> saying
> > > > that hotmail is slower now that it's on W2K than before? and when
> you/I say
> > > > slower here you mean in the time to deliver mail?
> > > >
> > > > If that is so then I think you don't realize that you have further
> > > > reenforced the nickname for Solaris "slowaris" because it's the
> Solaris
> > > > portion of Hotmail that handles the actual routing/delivery of mail -
> NOT
> > > > the W2K/IIS front end server pool.
> > > >
> > > > yes, i would agree that the reason they are fixing the hotmail
> application
> > > > is because solaris cannot scale well enough to handle the loads
> hotmail
> > > > generates.
> > >
> > > Liar.
> > >
> > > M$ tried to migrate hotmail FROM Solaris to a wannabe M$-OS, and it
> > > failed big time (just like on the previous attempts).
> > >
> > > Solaris can handle the load
> > > LoseNT can't
> > > Lose2K can't
> > >
> > > Hope that helps, liar.
> >
> > Why don't you just threaten to shoot him, Rambo?
> >
> >
> cause he can't get that right either... ask his CO
I have a BETTER idea....coward.
How about YOU ask my CO.
Bet you won't....COWARD.
heh heh heh
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
ICQ # 3056642
http://directedfire.com/greatgungiveaway/directedfire.referrer.fcgi?2632
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (D) above.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.advocacy) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Advocacy Digest
******************************
