Linux-Advocacy Digest #721, Volume #32 Fri, 9 Mar 01 12:13:06 EST
Contents:
Re: C# (Craig Kelley)
Re: definition of "free" for N-millionth time
Re: > 40 Bank's hacked by russion mafia: NT servers of course ("Frank Crawford")
Re: Another Linux "Oopsie"! (Craig Kelley)
Re: What does IQ measure? (Aaron Kulkis)
Re: What does IQ measure? (Aaron Kulkis)
Re: What does IQ measure? (Aaron Kulkis)
Re: What does IQ measure? (Aaron Kulkis)
Re: What does IQ measure? (Aaron Kulkis)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Craig Kelley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: C#
Date: 09 Mar 2001 09:10:41 -0700
"Erik Funkenbusch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Craig Kelley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > > Java isn't interpreted.
> > >
> > > Java is interpreted, it can be compiled, but the language is designed
> and
> > > implemented as an interpreted language.
> >
> > No, it isn't interpreted. I can say I've never used a Java
> > interpretor, and I've done a lot of Java development.
> >
> > Just because something doesn't compile into ia32 doesn't mean it's
> > interpreted.
>
> What are you using to execute your java applications?
A Java virtual machine with JIT compiling.
Why do you think Microsoft wants to copy this cool technology?
--
It won't be long before the CPU is a card in a PCI slot on your ATX videoboard
Craig Kelley -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.isu.edu/~kellcrai finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for PGP block
------------------------------
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: gnu.misc.discuss,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,misc.int-property
Subject: Re: definition of "free" for N-millionth time
Date: 10 Mar 2001 01:25:03 +0900
>>>>> "Jay" == Jay Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jay> Freedom must necessarily include the freedom to do things
Jay> that piss you off, or else it is a hollow shell.
of course.
let's see, you're american, right?
i thought so.
you believe in the consitution?
religiously? i'm not surprised. anyway, could you explain to me why
i see this recurring phrase "congreff shall make no law..." and hey,
what about that bill of rights? they're phrased _negatively_, as
restrictions on uhh, Freedom. it's looking to me that in order to
establish good old-fashioned american-as-apple-pie freedom we have to
have limits (gasp) unfreedom (swoons), at the very least, a limit on
destroying the architecture of freedom. otherwise, as you say, it's a
hollow shell.
i don't think you really want the freedom you think you want. cuz,
like, man, you'd be a slave. i know you think you'd be sitting
pretty, but you'd just be another house nigger.
g.m.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Of course, you UNDERSTAND about the PLAIDS in the SPIN CYCLE --
------------------------------
From: "Frank Crawford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: > 40 Bank's hacked by russion mafia: NT servers of course
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2001 16:07:49 +0000
On Fri, 09 Mar 2001 15:30:05 +0000,"Mike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote (in
message <1G6q6.30453$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>):
> Unless... could it be? Of course. More subtle humor.
>
Mike, you're to good.
(too?)
> -- Mike --
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: Craig Kelley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Another Linux "Oopsie"!
Date: 09 Mar 2001 09:06:17 -0700
"Edward Rosten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> That is an additional feature. If you want to do it the windows-way,
> >> don't configure anything regarding printing in the gimp, and it will
> >> generate postscript as any other app.
> >
> > And as we have discovered, Mandrake will print the postscript without
> > any filtering. Other Linuxes might filter it for your specific printer,
> > but Mdk doesn't.
>
> From what I've gathered, it isn't a Mdk problem. Mdk uses CUPS which
> allows a `raw' flag to be set for the data, which GIMP likes to set.
> Other distros use lp? which don't seem to allow a raw flag.
Mandrake has complete control over the applications they ship. If
they want to pioneer with CUPS, that's fine -- but they should also go
through every one of their applications to ensure that they work with
it first.
I like the idea of CUPS, I hope it takes off. BSD lpd is fairly awful
for many reasons; LPRng makes it much less awful but still.
--
It won't be long before the CPU is a card in a PCI slot on your ATX videoboard
Craig Kelley -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.isu.edu/~kellcrai finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for PGP block
------------------------------
From: Aaron Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.destroy.microsoft,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,soc.singles
Subject: Re: What does IQ measure?
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2001 11:08:41 -0500
Scott Gardner wrote:
>
> On Wed, 7 Mar 2001 14:05:46 -0800, Brock Hannibal
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> >It may be an advantage in many situations but if I can get further in a
> >> >problem than someone who thinks more quickly, who is the most intelligent?
> >>
> >> Or, if the more one thinks about something, the clearer it becomes, rather
> >> than muddying up pretty accurate instantaneous responses.
> >
> >Huh? (tm)
> >
> >--
> >Brock
>
> I know what he's talking about--in the Navy, we call it "Nuking
> Something Out", named for those in the Naval Nuclear Power field that
> are prone to such behavior, or simply "Trick-Fucking Yourself". It
> happens when you throw away a perfectly good first impression, hunch,
> or educated guess in favor of deep introspection, consideration of
> multiple possiblities, and leading to an invariable f**king-up of the
> answer. An example would be a person who, when asked how far a fired
> projectile will travel, decides to be slick and try to account for the
> curvature of the earth and the air resistance in his answer. Well, an
> hour or so down the road, he's used a sine function where he meant to
> use cosine, or dropped a unit in the air density, and his answer is
> off by several orders of magnitude. Was he intelligent in realizing
> that the curvature of the earth and air density would play a factor in
> his answer? Absolutely. But he got himself in over his head with the
> calculations and ended up with an answer that was poorer than if he
> had just used the one-line algebraic solution in the first place.
>
These are two SEPERATE problems
One is "what is an approximate answer", which is what the "first
impression" result is.
The other problem is "what is the PRECISE answer", which, as you
have alluded, requires precise, error-prone calculations.
this has NOTHING to do with intelligence, and everything to
do with the fact that without a computer, finding the answer
is exceedingly errorprone.
Tell me...how many boatswain's mates could even tell you
all of the factors which influence "air resistance", let
alone build plausible mathematical models for how it varies
over the flight path of a 16-inch projectile traveling
a couple-dozen miles downrange?
> Scott Gardner
> LT US Navy
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
K: Truth in advertising:
Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shelala,
Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakan,
Special Interest Sierra Club,
Anarchist Members of the ACLU
Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
------------------------------
From: Aaron Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.destroy.microsoft,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,soc.singles
Subject: Re: What does IQ measure?
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2001 11:19:44 -0500
Scott Gardner wrote:
>
> On Thu, 08 Mar 2001 21:13:59 -0600, turtoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >Scott Gardner wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 08 Mar 2001 13:42:44 -0500, Aaron Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Actually, those in the top centiles of IQ marry MORE often...especially
> >> >the men. The difference is...just like everything else they do...they
> >> >do so INTELLIGENTLY.
> >>
> >> This threw me for a loop at first. I was wondering why, if they marry
> >> so intelligently, they're doing it "more often" (ie, repeatedly). Of
> >> course I realize what you meant was that people in the top percentiles
> >> of IQ are more likely to be married... Was still good for a laugh in
> >> my moment of confusion...
> >
> >personally i would put forward that it's been my observation that people who
> >are highly skilled in some areas tend to be lacking in others. we can only
> >just take a look at the sample of very successful people within the media
> >only to watch them make a complete mess of their personal life's and fail at
> >being able to form successful long term successful relationships.
> >
>
> True. Hollywood is one of my almost-pet-peeves. (I only allow myself
> three or four full-blown pet peeves, so I have to be selective about
> what I let bother me.)
> Why is that we (speaking about the American culture here) pay these
> people millions of dollars, practically worship them as dieties or
> royalty, pay them to endorse our products, and generally emulate the
> hell out of them when their only talent that they exercise publicly is
> their ability to act!?!? I know that some of them have other
> talents--hell, Kris Kristofferson was a Rhodes scholar, for goodness
> sakes, but he's not famous for his thinking, he's famous for reciting
> lines given to him by a writer! I've always wondered if the writers
> for the show "Friends" get to wash the stars' Porsches as part of
> their contract!
The problem with Hollywood is that it is *NOT* a meritocracy.
The reason Hollywood types always complain so much about how
"unfair" America is, that it's all based on who you know, not what
you know is because....THAT'S how ****HOLLYWOOD*** (and the rest
of the TV & Movie industry) is.
Every day, casting calls go out. Happening to know the director
is a VERY big plus for landing that first big part where the director
specifically wants "an unknown".
> And I won't get started on sports stars...
> I don't think that having a great talent in one area necessitates a
> weakness in any other given area. Sure, there are a lot of Hollywood
> stars that are divorced and/or on drugs, but there are a lot of
> "ordinary" people in the same situation, too. I think media stars are
> just like anyone else in every area except whatever it is they're
> famous for. There are media stars that are happily married, divorced,
> smart, stupid, tolerant, bigoted, what have you, just like the rest of
> society, probably in the same proportions.
Basically, the brain has some sort of pre-determined maximum
capability.....which varies from person to person....just as
your muscle system has some maximum level of performance.
You can have EXCELLANT genes or musculature...but if you decide
to be a lazy-ass couch potato, you will never realize the potential.
Conversely, if you havelousy genes in that respect (for example,
some combination which doesn't produce the hormones for muscle
development and growth at optimal levels), then no amount of
exercise is going to take you past your personal maximum potential.
Same thing with IQ. All of your top-level athletes are capable
of behaving like high-IQ people. They never would have LEARNED
how to perform BETTER THAN ALL OF THE OTHER PROFESSIONALS IN THEIR
SPORT if they were stupid. The fact that many of them make some
exceedingly stupid choices in their personal/financial lives is
more indicative of the jock-culture which discourages reading
and other broad-based learning activities. Most of their problems
are not so much a matter of stupidity but of ignorance.
Stupidity is having the necessary information to make the correct
decision...and making the wrong decision. Ignorance is a state of
never having been introduced to the information in the first place.
>
> Scott Gardner
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
K: Truth in advertising:
Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shelala,
Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakan,
Special Interest Sierra Club,
Anarchist Members of the ACLU
Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
------------------------------
From: Aaron Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.destroy.microsoft,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,soc.singles
Subject: Re: What does IQ measure?
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2001 11:22:34 -0500
turtoni wrote:
>
> Scott Gardner wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 07 Mar 2001 22:49:34 -0500, Aaron Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >Part of the definition of intelligence is arriving at the correct
> > >answer quickly.
> > >
> > >If you gave a 13-year old child the following math problem:
> > >
> > > X = 20 / 4
> > >
> > > What is X?
> > >
> > >
> > What about the (possibly apocryphal) story of the classroom that is
> > given the assignment to add up all the integers from 1 to 100? All of
> > the students but one immediately see the method to the solution, and
> > start adding 1+2+3+4+5..., while one lone student just stares at his
> > paper in silence. The teacher notices this, and goes over to help the
> > student along. When she approaches him, he looks up and says "The
> > answer is 5,050." He figured out that the 100 numbers in question
> > could be grouped into 50 pairs of numbers (1,100), (2,99), (2,98),
> > etcetera, and that furthermore, each of those pairs of numbers summed
> > to 101. The product of 50 times 101 is a pretty easy calculation, and
> > results in the correct answer of 5,050. Additionally, he could do the
> > same thing with an arbitrarily long string of sequential integers, so
> > even if his exercise had taken longer than the other students, (which
> > it probably didn't), it could be argued that his was the more
> > "intelligent" approach, even if he didn't figure out this method as
> > quickly as the other students figured out the "brute force" method.
>
> true. although all these concepts are pretty broad band.
Actually not true.
The little boy in the story was Karl Gauss, a notable scientist of
the 1800's.
> we can all be trained to approach puzzles like this given enough time.
Karl Gauss was truly brilliant....and this anecdote demonstrates it.
By the way, most adult high-IQ individuals are CLEARLY identifiable
as such as early as the age of 5.
>
> spending more time doing something does not imo make somebody of lesser
> intelligence.
>
> turtoni - just less skilled in that department at that moment in time.
> imo.
>
> > Scott Gardner
> > LT US NAvy
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
K: Truth in advertising:
Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shelala,
Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakan,
Special Interest Sierra Club,
Anarchist Members of the ACLU
Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
------------------------------
From: Aaron Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.destroy.microsoft,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,soc.singles
Subject: Re: What does IQ measure?
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2001 11:25:51 -0500
turtoni wrote:
>
> Scott Gardner wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 08 Mar 2001 13:42:44 -0500, Aaron Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >Actually, those in the top centiles of IQ marry MORE often...especially
> > >the men. The difference is...just like everything else they do...they
> > >do so INTELLIGENTLY.
> >
> > This threw me for a loop at first. I was wondering why, if they marry
> > so intelligently, they're doing it "more often" (ie, repeatedly). Of
> > course I realize what you meant was that people in the top percentiles
> > of IQ are more likely to be married... Was still good for a laugh in
> > my moment of confusion...
>
> personally i would put forward that it's been my observation that people who
> are highly skilled in some areas tend to be lacking in others. we can only
> just take a look at the sample of very successful people within the media
> only to watch them make a complete mess of their personal life's and fail at
> being able to form successful long term successful relationships.
Most of those who are skilled with firearms have very little use
for mastering the long bow.
So what's your point.
Also the media is a particularly fucked up system...it is NOT
a meritocracy...it is the ULTIMATE "it's not what you know buty
who you schmooze (and sleep with)" fraternity/sorority system.
>
> in fact you might say even go so far as to say that the the least successful
> people are more likely to stay together for economic reasons and also more
> likely to go with the flow and build large families, also for economic
> reasons.
>
> so if we were to imagine that being intelligent is genetic and that those
> people are more likely to be constantly putting one's self on the line and
> therefore more likely to die out. we should therefore be on a downward
> spiral intellectually which just imo hasn't been proven to be the case.
>
> i think what it spells out is that we all have a capacity to be intelligent
> and that it just needs to be turned on whilst it's also true to say that
> some people have some abnormality which gives them a drive and/or makes them
> more likely to be what society considers to as define success.
>
> and i also believe we have become more civilized and that life expectancy
> has greatly improved but we are still essentially the same monkey as our
> distant ancestor.
>
> turtoni - but there is room for radical movement, imo.
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
K: Truth in advertising:
Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shelala,
Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakan,
Special Interest Sierra Club,
Anarchist Members of the ACLU
Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
------------------------------
From: Aaron Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.destroy.microsoft,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,soc.singles
Subject: Re: What does IQ measure?
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2001 11:30:36 -0500
Donovan Rebbechi wrote:
>
> On Thu, 08 Mar 2001 01:32:23 GMT, Brent R wrote:
> >Donovan Rebbechi wrote:
> >>
>
> >JD Salinger had an IQ score of 115, still above average but not showing
> >his true ability. To some the man is a complete genius. I also so a show
To others, the man is a laughing stock who's out of his league, and
should consider himself lucky to have ever been near the White House.
Some of those people even think the JFK was not well-served by having
a man of such meager abilities on the White House staff.
See JD's ignorant press releases about the Pan Am 700 (?) explosion
(the airliner that blew up in mysterious circumstances just one week
before the 1996 olympic games in Atlanta).
> >where a man with an IQ of 75 (he's mentally disabled) could craft
> >picture perfect animal replicas out of clay in very short time. His
> >pieces sell for millions at some art galleries. He's also considered a
> >genius.
>
> Like I said, anomolies can fool the test. Especially if the person has
> some kind of disability, the test is unlikely to be reliable.
>
> The most obvious examples are people with learning disabilities. These
> people may well understand course material, but need to be given extra
> time. They actually benefit from the extra time (whereas another student
> would not benefit substantially)
>
> The problem with testing people with disabilities is that they may be very
> deficient in one small area, and OK with everything else, and most
> tests are not capable of conveying that information (it's sort of
> like height/weight charts that tell you that bodybuilders are all overweight
> when they actually have less than 10% fat)
>
> >Also, it seems I have been dealt several hands of bad karma today after
> >making that unwarranted attack on Aaron. I guess I will apologize now, I
> >wasn't in the best of moods at the time.
>
> We all understand -- just about everyone here has felt the urge to make
> an "unwarranted attack" on Aaron at some time.
> --
> Donovan Rebbechi * http://pegasus.rutgers.edu/~elflord/ *
> elflord at panix dot com
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
K: Truth in advertising:
Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shelala,
Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakan,
Special Interest Sierra Club,
Anarchist Members of the ACLU
Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list by posting to comp.os.linux.advocacy.
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Advocacy Digest
******************************
