Linux-Advocacy Digest #235, Volume #33 Sat, 31 Mar 01 20:13:04 EST
Contents:
Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism) ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Communism (Scott Erb)
Re: Communism ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Treason (was Re: Communism) ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Why does Open Source exist, and what way is it developing? (The Ghost In The
Machine)
Re: Communism ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Fun With Parallel Ports. (Bloody Viking)
Re: Communism ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: gates messiah (Anonymous)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.destroy.microsoft,us.military.army,soc.singles
Subject: Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism)
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 19:54:18 -0500
Roger Perkins wrote:
>
> That's because these anti-government guys think anyone who doesn't do what
> they want them to do are traitors. My way or the highway attitude. What
> they are advocating is dictatorship, not an American government.
Yeah, right Perko...I'm so "anti-government" that I'm a currently serving
soldier...going on my 3rd enlistment.
>
> Roger
> AIRBORNE!
>
> "Paul Holloway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > On Fri, 30 Mar 2001 20:57:29 -0800, GreyCloud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >"Joseph T. Adams" wrote:
> > >>
> > >> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Roger Perkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > >> : Lets see... anti-constitutional subversive activity. Like you saying
> those
> > >> : who believe in a different economic system should be shot? Now
> that's real
> > >> : "constitutional" of you, aaron. You can't have it both ways -
> > >> : constitutionally and your way. And that is why you are considered
> ignorant
> > >> : and a nazi by the adults here.
> > >>
> > >> Actually, according to the U.S. Constitution and federal law, Aaron is
> > >> mostly correct.
> > >>
> > >> If you're a U.S. Citizen, but choose to make war against your own
> > >> country, or give aid and comfort to its very numerous enemies (foreign
> > >> or domestic), then you're guilty of treason, a capital crime.
> > >>
> > >> Also, if you conspire to violate the Constitutionally guaranteed
> > >> rights of any U.S. Citizen under color of law, you're guilty of a
> > >> felony, which becomes a capital crime if loss of life results.
> > >>
> > >> Regarding the Communist Party USA (CPUSA), membership in it was once
> > >> held to be illegal for this reason - not because you aren't entitled
> > >> to hold and express any opinions you wish, but because you are not
> > >> entitled to conspire to violate the rights of others.
> > >>
> > >> But right now the CPUSA, though obnoxious, is among the very least of
> > >> our problems. Both of the "mainstream" parties are much worse, since
> > >> they have much more power.
> > >>
> > >> Both major parties advocate and practice socialism (in varying
> > >> degrees), both have *knowingly* caused massive loss of life, liberty
> > >> and property, which they were supposed to protect, and both have
> > >> conspired, very successfully, to make this nation an oligarchy
> > >> masquerading as a democracy, rather than the Republic that by law it
> > >> must be.
> > >>
> > >> Hence, there are a LOT of traitors in our midst. And given the threat
> > >> that they pose to the life, liberty and property of all people (both
> > >> inside the U.S. and elsewhere), I think it is not only reasonable, but
> > >> necessary, that the worst of them be dealt with as the law requires.
> > >>
> > >> Aaron is not advocating that we round up everyone - just those who are
> > >> the most blatantly and obviously guilty. And, so long as these folks
> > >> get an *exceedingly* fair trial, and as long as their sentences are
> > >> somewhat commensurate with their crimes, I am in total agreement with
> > >> him.
> > >>
> > >> I don't want more bloodshed. I think there's been too much already
> > >> (the left's war on unborn children, the right's war on drugs, and
> > >> other kinds too numerous to list). But it is absolutely necessary
> > >> that the crimes against peaceful and law-abiding U.S. Citizens, not to
> > >> mention the nationals of many other countries who have been harmed by
> > >> actions of our so-called "government," be ended. Hopefully, by the
> > >> most peaceful means possible.
> > >>
> > >> I too took an oath to defend the United States, its lawful government,
> > >> its Constitution, its citizens, and its valid laws against all threats
> > >> whether domestic or foreign. So have millions of others. We are
> > >> greatly outnumbered by the traitors at the moment, but times and
> > >> political winds do change, and I remain hopeful that someday we will
> > >> be able to return to a legitimate, federal, Constitutional, republican
> > >> form of government.
> > >>
> > >> Joe
> > >
> > >Thank you! Well put!
> > >
> > >--
> > >V
> > >
> >
> >
> > Hmmmmm, ya'll are living in a different USA than I am. Maybe I took a
> > wrong turn somewhere, I just don't see these multitudes of traitors
> > strolling around everyday.
> >
> >
> > "May you always have fair winds and following seas..."
> >
> > Paul Holloway
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
K: Truth in advertising:
Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shelala,
Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakan,
Special Interest Sierra Club,
Anarchist Members of the ACLU
Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
------------------------------
From: Scott Erb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles,alt.society.liberalism
Subject: Re: Communism
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 19:46:44 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Communism requires that people should NOT be out for any personnal
> gain. If everyone always acred in the best interests of 'society' as a
> whole, then maybe communism could work. But people don't, and communism
> doesn't.
The irony, of course, is that those who made up the Communist party and
the governmental elite are those who in a capitalist society would
probably be the business leaders -- the ambitious, upwardly mobile with
a desire to get ahead.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.destroy.microsoft,misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles
Subject: Re: Communism
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 20:02:08 -0500
"T. Max Devlin" wrote:
>
> Said Aaron R. Kulkis in alt.destroy.microsoft on Fri, 30 Mar 2001
> >"T. Max Devlin" wrote:
> >>
> >> Said Aaron R. Kulkis in alt.destroy.microsoft on Fri, 30 Mar 2001
> >> >Mathew wrote:
> >> [...]
> >> >Having a monopoly is not illegal.
> >> >
> >> >Engaging in a pattern of anti-competitive behavior to gain and hold
> >> >the monopoly *is*.
> >>
> >> And since there *is no other way to have a monopoly* in a free-market
> >> capitalist economy, having a monopoly is evidence of monopolization, and
> >> is therefore unlawful, if not illegal. This is the reason Congress did
> >
> >Close, but not quite.
> >
> >Anybody who is the sole supplier of an item manufactured with, or
> >incorporating, a patent which he holds, is a LEGAL monopolist for
> >the duration of the patent.
>
> This statement has been specifically, absolutely, and clearly refuted by
> the Supreme Court. No, a patent is not a "license to monopolize". It
> is simple ownership of "intellectual property". You cannot prevent
> others from competing, merely from using your patent. And predatory or
Which is a monopoly on all devices made using that patent.
> anti-competitive licensing or royalty arrangements are quite actionable,
> under the Sherman Act.
>
> The reason your point seems valid is that you misconstrue what
> "monopoly" is. A common problem, because hundreds of years ago, it
> meant something different (exclusive right to sell granted by the
> sovereign.) A couple decades ago, AT&T tried to argue they had been
> "given a monopoly" in phone service, and the Supreme Court again agreed
> that this was not the case. There is no such thing as a "legal
> monopoly", as both monopolization *and attempted monopolization* are
> both illegal.
>
All true, but totally immaterial to current law.
> --
> T. Max Devlin
> *** The best way to convince another is
> to state your case moderately and
> accurately. - Benjamin Franklin ***
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
K: Truth in advertising:
Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shelala,
Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakan,
Special Interest Sierra Club,
Anarchist Members of the ACLU
Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.destroy.microsoft,us.military.army,soc.singles,misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Treason (was Re: Communism)
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 19:58:54 -0500
Roger Perkins wrote:
>
> Don't encourage the little moron. He doesn't know the difference between a
> nazi and a communist, both of which I am according to him.
The only significant difference between Nazism and Communism is that
the Nazis kill the poor first, and the Communists kill the rich first.
How else would you account for the fact that Hitler and Stalin EACH
emulated oppressive laws and regulations introduced by the other.
> He's just an
> oxygen bandit.
As opposed to someone suffering from brain damage due to oxygen-deprivation
when he got his head caught in the shroud lines.
>
> Roger "Ve vere just folllowink ORDERS!" Perkins
> AIRBORNE!
^^^^^^^^
ASSHOLE!
>
> "Scott Erb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >
> >
> > "Aaron R. Kulkis" wrote:
> > > Let's suppose for a moment, Roger, that you are not, in fact, a
> > > fully indoctrinated Communist.
> > >
> > > If that is so...then I'm sure that you can specifically name a few
> > > of the ways in which you fundamentally disagree with Communist
> philosophy.
> > >
> > > Accuracy counts, so be precise
> >
> > That sounds like the McCarthy era hearings, putting the burden of proof
> > on someone to prove that somehow they are not something. You are the
> > one who needs to be precise: what do you consider the "philosophy of
> > communism" to be? For me it would be: 1) no private property, the state
> > owns and controls all means of production; 2) no democracy, as democracy
> > is to communists a tool of bourgeious capitalists; rather, you need a
> > vanguard party to guide society to utopia; 3) a fundamental belief that
> > human nature, culture, and politics are all products of the economic
> > mode of production, and 4) a belief that once you change the mode of
> > production to a purely socialist system where the state has managed to
> > push away capitalist ideas and has created a communist culture, then the
> > state can whither away as the people, no longer poisoned by capitalist
> > exploitation will cooperate.
> >
> > Even though you didn't ask me, I certainly don't believe any of the
> > four. I've traveled a bit in Russia and know a lot of people there,
> > communism Soviet style sucked. I haven't seen any other poster profess
> > any of these things. So your question seems to be a distraction and
> > obfuscation of a debate, and serves no purpose except to try to put
> > yourself on the offensive.
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
K: Truth in advertising:
Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shelala,
Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakan,
Special Interest Sierra Club,
Anarchist Members of the ACLU
Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (The Ghost In The Machine)
Subject: Re: Why does Open Source exist, and what way is it developing?
Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2001 00:58:50 GMT
In comp.os.linux.advocacy, Wilbert Kruithof
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote
on Wed, 28 Mar 2001 19:38:49 +0200
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>Hello!
>
>Let me explain why I am asking this question. First of all I want
>to say that it's not my intention to discuss about advantages of
>several operating systems, nor software/hardware vendors. I am also
>not a newbie to unix (clones), so no RTFM, or www.opensource.org.
>Do not see this as presumption, or something like that.
Fair enough.
>
>The only thing I am asking for is an answer to above question.
>*What* way is Open Source developing?
That's a very vague question; how am I supposed to answer it? :-)
But it can lead to interesting discussions.
>
>And is there a connection between Darwins theory and the way
>Open Source is developing??
I'm not sure about Darwin's theory; one might be able to perform
a mapping between software "memes" (ideas, such as a spreadsheet,
a video player, a better utility to display contents of a directory,
etc.) and organisms/populations such as E. Coli, turtles, penguins,
humpback whales, seagulls, etc. in a niche, and suggest that those
software memes which are the most interesting prosper and mutate
(since everyone will contribute to them, patch them, add capabilities
to them) and the less interesting ones stagnate, and may eventually
die (be lost to the world). Competition occasionally breaks out
(KDE vs. Gnome, CORBA vs. COM, OpenDoc vs. OLE, etc.) and the
more interesting/useful/available/etc. one wins. Maybe.
This isn't quite like classical evolution admittedly, where the
rate of mutation is relatively constant (except near uranium
mines and such). I don't know enough theory to be sure, admittedly
(my understanding is that there are scientists/mathematicians out there
who know the mutation rate and can make interesting predictions).
Just to make things even more interesting: there is a theoretical
branch of computer software development -- and it may already be
deployed -- which uses the very mechanism of evolution to find
an efficient problem-solver; it links the ability to solve a
particular problem with the survivability of the organism, and
throws in random mutation of codes; those that get too bloated
die off. A variant of the old game "Corewars", in a sense -- but
far more useful.
There is another branch which uses DNA replication to construct a
massively parallel quasi-computer in a test tube; I don't know
the details, but the quasi-computer is fed, then analyzed for the
solution. At some point, we may be developing using test tubes and
machine-controlled incubators rather than transistors and switches. :-)
A third branch doesn't have to do with evolution at all, but may
use light quanta for even more massively parallel computation.
Development of this platform is probably decades off, but the idea
is intriguing, and a bit scary for those of us developing cryptographic
protections -- if this ever comes to fruition, the NSA will most
likely be intensely interested in developing a machine which can
handle thousands of qbits. (1 qbit = 1 conventional bit except it
can hold both states at once, in accordance with quantum theory [*];
current state of the art can handle about 4 or 5 qbits, I think.
However, I'm not involved with the research myself.) Note that
commercial-grade encryption is currently 128 bits; if one were to
try to find a key using current brute-force methods, the universe would
probably die first. (5*10^10 years = 1.578*10^18 seconds
= 1.369 * 2^60 seconds; we'd need something vibrating at
2^68 Hz = 3 * 10^20 Hz ; light vibrates from 300 to 700 nm, or
4.3*10^14 Hz to 10^15 Hz. For comparison, AM radio stations are at
5.60*10^5Hz to 1.600*10^6Hz, and FM are 8.8*10^7 Hz to 1.08*10^8 Hz;
current computers are at 1.4*10^9 Hz. I don't know offhand what the
most energetic quanta vibrate at; presumably, some nuclear reaction, maybe
the fusion of 4 H to 1 He, might throw out something interesting. :-) )
Military-grade encryption may use 1,024 bits, or even more; note
that adding a bit doubles the size of the problem in conventional
computing, all other things being equal (e.g., not being able to
exploit a weakness in the implementation).
And then there's the issue of resurrecting old software from backups
and reworking it, if someone's interested. One might liken this
to warming a frozen embryo, with the addition that software is
far easier to clone than an animal, although it may depend on the
software's complexity ("hello world" versus a complex operating
system such as Linux, Solaris, HP-UX, or Windows NT) and how
well it was documented.
>
>Actually, this is my important question. Please react serious,
>than it is not necessary to cross-post this :).
>
>Thanks in advantage!
I think you mean "advance", but you're welcome. :-)
[.sigsnip]
[*] Quantum mechanics is actually rather interesting; the math gets
hairy fairly quickly -- but the basic idea is simple enough.
A particle can have all possible states until it interacts with
another particle; at that point, the two particles change state
in a predetermined manner. Some wacky things (wacky to us,
that is; we're not used to this) can happen with this theory;
for example, two identical particles could exchange state with each
other (there's already been an experiment that uses this property,
if memory serves). Another derivative is that light can behave
both as a particle and a wave -- and so can electrons and even atoms!
QM can explain both the photoelectric effect and the dual-slit
electron experiment. There's even a relativistic variant
of Schroedinger's equation, for those that need it (as if the
standard one isn't bad enough :-) ).
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- insert random misquote here
EAC code #191 54d:08h:47m actually running Linux.
The Usenet channel. All messages, all the time.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles
Subject: Re: Communism
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 20:00:21 -0500
Scott Erb wrote:
>
> Strabo wrote:
> > > That's a tad simplistic. Human nature is not necessarily incompatible
> > > with socialism or communism, but Marxian communism ignored culture and
> > > politics in its focus on economic determinism. It also, in its
> > > Leninists variants, saw the state as being able to enforce a complete
> > > change in society, something that does indeed lead to tyranny. If any
> > > kind of socialism is ever to be achieved, it will have to be democratic
> > > and chosen, not enforced. I suspect that is still generations away.
> >
> > You can have benign absolute rule but once started
> > down this path, malignancy soon sets in.
>
> True...there does seem to be an aspect of human nature that makes it
> corruptible when people have power over others.
It couldn't be that Communism concentrates ALL the power in one place.
And...as we know...power attracts the corrupt, and absolute power
attracts the absolutely corrupt.
No...of course not.
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
K: Truth in advertising:
Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shelala,
Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakan,
Special Interest Sierra Club,
Anarchist Members of the ACLU
Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bloody Viking)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,alt.destroy.microsoft
Subject: Re: Fun With Parallel Ports.
Date: 1 Apr 2001 01:02:44 GMT
Aaron R. Kulkis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: It would have taken less effort to just write an assembler to do it for you,
: so that you could just type in the code in 6502 assembly language, and
: let the computer do the dull, repetitive work for you.
At the time I didn't know about assemblers nor had the ability to code one
myself. So, I was limited by only my abilities at the time. At the time, I
coded machine language by coding in BASIC with the pokes to load the routine
and then turn on the routine at the end of the programme. It was certainly a
crude method but it did work. Had I continued, I would have used the BASIC as
the assembler as I started to do at the time by remembering all the op codes
by their decimal number.
But despite my limited abilities at the time, it shows that on the Commodore
it was fully possible to code a TSR becuse the interrupt was documented in the
programmer's reference guide. On the PC, the same thing is not so easy. The
stuff in DOS's kernel is a secret held by Microshit. TSR coders have to crack
the kernel to code one now.
With Linux, however, coding a daemon is easy as everything is documented in
some way shape or form. A crude method is to make an account to run it and
give it sudo root permission to run the device in question. Can't do that on
DOS.
--
FOOD FOR THOUGHT: 100 calories are used up in the course of a mile run.
The USDA guidelines for dietary fibre is equal to one ounce of sawdust.
The liver makes the vast majority of the cholesterol in your bloodstream.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.destroy.microsoft,misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles
Subject: Re: Communism
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 20:04:45 -0500
Donovan Rebbechi wrote:
>
> On Sat, 31 Mar 2001 12:03:12 -0500, Aaron R. Kulkis wrote:
> >Mathew wrote:
> >>
>
> >> What about Capitalist dictatorships like the Philippines under Marcos?
> >
> >It's a perfect exampe of what I was saying: Economic freedom leads to
> >political freedom...because it destabilizes the dictatorship.
>
> Singapore ?
>
Singapore was quite the benign dictatorship. The economic freedom
(to pack up and leave if things got bad) meant that those in charge
were kept in line by the simple specter of mass emmigration of
the most talented people to...somewhere beyond their control.
> --
> Donovan Rebbechi * http://pegasus.rutgers.edu/~elflord/ *
> elflord at panix dot com
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
K: Truth in advertising:
Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shelala,
Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakan,
Special Interest Sierra Club,
Anarchist Members of the ACLU
Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 18:06:27 -0700
From: Anonymous <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: gates messiah
Crossposted-To:
alt.destroy.microsoft,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,soc.singles
ejeem wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Anonymous <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >some nerd:
> >> In soc.singles Anonymous <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> | having to deal with unix taught me to count my windows blessings.
> >> | jackie 'anakin' tokeman
> >>
> >> Your archnemisis, Steve Chaney, seems to have had no trouble learning
> >> to use unix. Guess you're finally conceding that Chaney's smarter
> >> than you....
> >
> >for a mildly clever guy you sure say some retarded shit.
> > jackie 'anakin' tokeman
>
> Steve knows as much unix as the guy sitting next to him explains
> in excrutiating detail. Repeatedly.
>
> -Jeem, and slowly
has he ever been called out on a major bonehead claim re: unix?
jackie 'anakin' tokeman
men fear thought as they fear nothing else on earth - more than ruin,
more even than death
- bertrand russell
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list by posting to comp.os.linux.advocacy.
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Advocacy Digest
******************************
